Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Negative Inductance and measure of Magnetic force.

Started by synchro1, November 19, 2017, 08:20:57 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 3 Guests are viewing this topic.

synchro1

Imagine two solenoid air core coils of the same dimension and weight in copper facing each other; Next, two axial polarized tube magnets connected to each other with a rod and positioned inside the coil cores.

We use one coil to pulse power one Neo tube and gather input from it's twin.

What would happen if we added a second magnet to the core of the power coil? The output from the pickup coil would double from the additional strength of the power magnets with no increase in input power, right?

What would happen if we doubled the mass in copper of the power coil? We would double the output with the same unit of input too that way. We can quadruple the COP of this motor generator by doubling the strength of the power magnet and the weight in copper of the pulse coil, right?

The same proportions hold true for the EM oscillator. The only difference is that we need to understand that the increased core inductance of the EM coil has the same effect on field strength as increasing the weight of copper wire in the pulse coil.

synchro1

Three ways to increase output: Increase magnet strength, magnet motion or coil windings.

The ratio's the same with the power factor; Increasing coil windings will increase magnet field strength in direct proportion to the weight in copper, as demonstrated by Hob Nilre.

Coil geometry and construction are separate factors. No one has ever seen an electromagnet used to drive a motor, or used as an output coil before.

Imagine two electromagnets taped together face to face, wired with DPDT switches, so each can generate a magnetic field and recover output from it's sister.

Let's apply Faraday's law of induction to this simple MEG: Doubling the weight in copper to the coils would quadruple the COP because we would double the field strength for unit of input while at the same time doubling the output.

We can multiply field strength in a coil be adding a ferrite core. This has the same effect on the amplification of field strength as increasing the coil windings.

What happens when we add a ferrite core to an output coil? It cogs the rotor magnet with magnetic attraction, and reverses the gain.

I have turned this attraction handicap into an advantage with the EM oscillator.

Taking advantage of core value over coil windings is a quantum leap in power generation. The increasing ferrite core strength has the potential to generate power in direct proportion as well as increasing copper coil windings. Consider this! This amounts to an important discovery

profitis

'Taking advantage of core value over coil
windings is a quantum leap in power generation.'> u know mos.THAT is the importend discovery

synchro1

The 12 pin spring pressure switch appears above and in the video below. This switch contains 3, 4 pin SPDT switches combined like the one running the oscillator.

The 600 Lb magnet is hazardous. Securing two 640 lb force "Electro-magnets" face to face and fastening them with a plastic lock tie would eliminate any pinching hazard from the huge permanent magnet.

The center 4 pin switch can power an EM oscillator of smaller size and control the two 640 lb electro magnets as a reciprocating MEG with the 2 remaining 4 pin switches to the outside. The controlling oscillator should run cost free because tests have shown it returns all of it's power.

The two MEG EM's would wire one to the outside and the other to the inside of each remaining 4 pin switch so that when one was off in the depressed position the other would be on and visa-versa.

Video of the 12 pin switch:

https://youtu.be/mEuPt-6cr4M

synchro1

This same 12 pin switch and oscillator could run two aircore solenoid coils with a long reciprocating axial polarized cylinder magnet piston, attached to a "Scotch Yoke" by a collar and pin in the center. This kind of motor could drive a large locomotive while recovering all it's input power, depending on the coil construction and magnet strength. The output would be pulsed D.C. from each end.

I demonstrated the "Unity" aspect of the oscillator. The work done by the oscillator piston is the free power. This is an example of free power doing work for zero cost.