Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



The secret to Overunity

Started by Tajerek, December 17, 2017, 07:40:33 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 3 Guests are viewing this topic.

sm0ky2

Quote from: Void on December 21, 2017, 06:39:23 PM
Hi Tajerek. It has already been pointed out to you that you are making major mistakes in
your assumptions and interpretations. The total charge on a capacitor at a given point in time
is equal to C x V, yes, but that in no way means or implies that to build up that charge on
the capacitor that no current has to flow. :) You are showing that you have no understanding
of what the formulas represent.


There is no possible way that you have tested this, because if you did do some actual testing
you would quickly realize that what you have been saying here is false. :) To charge a capacitor
requires a flow of current (flow of charges). The formula which you yourself have posted for the capacitor
charge current clearly shows that the higher the applied voltage, the higher the capacitor charging current will be.

For you to keep saying that when you apply a high voltage to the capacitor there will be little or no capacitor
charge current is not only obviously completely at odds with the formula which you posted, but it shows that
you have not even the most basic understanding of simple electric circuits and how capacitors work. If you did,
you would not be making such obvious errors.

I won't waste further time on this, as anyone with even just a very basic understanding of capacitors will be
able to see that what you are saying makes no sense.

All the best...


B.S.


To charge a capacitor you need only to apply Voltage to
One plate. (Or layer)


Potential.


Understand "what" a capacitor is.


Any two conductors are a capacitor. Even when one of those is only the air.


The device we label a capacitor, is an advanced form capable of holding
separated charges very well.
But by the technical definition, my metal desk is a capacitor.


(and I can discharge it through an inductor to prove this)


A hunk of metal, is a capacitor.


Two hunks of metal, separated by an insulator, is an even better capacitor.


(air can also act as the insulator if a more conductive plate is substituted)
(two air-conductors can act as plates, if a more insulative substance is substituted)


The ability to hold a charge is the ONLY real requirement.


A single electron, and single positron, can form a capacitor.
and comes pre-charged
(this will disintegrate upon discharge, so is 'temporary)


Rub your socked feet across the carpet, YOU are a capacitor.
Have a girl in glass slippers rub her feet across the same carpet
Now the both of you make an even Better capacitor.
Form a circuit between you to discharge it.
(sometimes experience is the best teacher)


Charge only wants to distribute uniformly across a conductor.


Yes, you can translate this motion of charge distribution into "current"
using various formulas, but the time-factor makes this an infinitesimal value.


——————————————-


if you charge Both plates of a capacitor, you are essentially forcing current into it.
And in this manner, yes there is a measurable current.
It is synonymous to the Carnot cycle.
You are wasting 50% of your charge.


Allow the second plate to charge inductively, requires only half of the potential.
And you can measure this if you refrain from grounding half of your charge.

I was fixing a shower-rod, slipped and hit my head on the sink. When i came to, that's when i had the idea for the "Flux Capacitor", Which makes Perpetual Motion possible.

Void

Quote from: sm0ky2 on December 21, 2017, 07:00:45 PM
To charge a capacitor you need only to apply Voltage to
One plate. (Or layer)

Good grief. Is it a full moon? ;)

Whether you a putting a 'charge' on a single piece of metal or on a two plate capacitor,
you must either remove charge or push more charge onto the metal. The movement of charge
is current.  At any rate, Tajerek was obviously not talking about putting a charge on a single piece of metal.
His diagram shows charging a two plate capacitor, and my comments were in response to what
Tajerek has been (falsely) saying here.


peper10


[size=0px]

       
  • Posts: 1692
  •  
  • [/font][/size]
[font=] [/font]



    Re: Kapanadze Cousin - DALLY FREE ENERGY 
« Reply #18732 on: December 18, 2017, 12:14:56 AM »
  [size=0px]

       
  • Quote
  • [/font][/size]
Hi peper10, the problem is not at all that you were sharing some ideas, but the problem is that you are making claims and getting upset because people were asking for some clarification and that sort of thing, and insisting that you know much more than people here even though it seems you haven't even put these things to the actual test.


You see VOID!   Instead of finding trouble with everyone theory, why don`t you try to experiment and come back with SOLID proof that he is wrong????  That`s what I find funny with this forum...   COUNTER CLAIMS are not validated but we are supposed to go with it..    That is a crazy world...[/li]
[/list]

Void

    Quote from: peper10 on December 21, 2017, 07:53:58 PM
    ...
    You see VOID!   Instead of finding trouble with everyone theory, why don`t you try to experiment and come back with SOLID proof that he is wrong????  That`s what I find funny with this forum...   COUNTER CLAIMS are not validated but we are supposed to go with it..    That is a crazy world...[/li]
    [/list]

    :o
    Good grief again... ;D

    I know it probably won't do any good to point out to you that I am not the one
    claiming to know the 'secret' to getting OU. ;) Pointing out that someone is making
    obviously false statements does not need to be proven, because this should already be
    obvious when looking at the formula for capacitor charge current which Tajerek posted.
    That is very basic stuff.

    The last full moon was apparently Dec 3, so that is not it... ;D


    peper10


    Quote from: Void on December 21, 2017, 08:10:23 PM
    :o
    Good grief again... ;D

    I know it probably won't do any good to point out to you that I am not the one
    claiming to know the 'secret' to getting OU. ;) Pointing out that someone is making
    obviously false statements does not need to be proven, because this should already be
    obvious when looking at the formula for capacitor charge current which Tajerek posted.
    That is very basic stuff.


    The last full moon was apparently Dec 3, so that is not it... ;D





    I just repeat what you have said to me{ Claim without testing is waisting time}...  If it`s good for you to tell any person that same phrase, it`s good resonning to serve you the same treatment...  [/color][/font][/size] 8) 8) 8) 8) 8)
    [/color][/font][/size]


    On other note, I see perfectly where Tajarek is heading and I`m sure he will get good results...[/color][/font][/size]