The secret to Overunity

[sm0ky2]

Sm0ky2 and TK,

The most significant thing in the video is not the generator output.

I guess that is to be interpreted.
We dont know what's in the box


The most significant thing to me was the spark and the glow of the metal.
That gives me a pretty good idea of the voltage and current
without measurement


As far as the things he is hinting at, hes no Robert Ripley.

[Cadman]

On the topic of OU...

A long time ago I came at this OU thing all backwards, trying to figure out how generators cut magnetic fields lines to "make" electricity. Of course that goes nowhere new by itself. So I started reading some physics and came across the explanations for charge, which led to electrostatics. We know that charge cannot be created or destroyed. So, does a generator generate by cutting lines of magnetic force or is there more to it?

Generators run for years, is all that electricity they put out contained in the copper and steel they are made of? Seems highly unlikely to me. I have never believed that the work used to turn the generator was the source of the electricity.. what, if I turn it by hand the energy I expend with my muscles is magically transformed into charge? No. If charge cannot be created then it must come from outside the generator. Electrostatic machines demonstrate that. To me, charge by influence is the most interesting of all.

Wouldn't it be great if we could just create a big charge sink and siphon off the charges flowing toward it?

[blueplanet]

From what is shown in the video, there is no suggestion there was any OU effect.

While the welding rods were sparking, the generator noise was going down. This suggests the spark has consumed quite a significant amount of energy from the generator.

There was certainly a current in the spark. We cannot assume that the current in the spark was zero. If the current in the spark was high, the circuit would heat up everything around and you would never get OU.

Fame 2.0


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HqWdxVNnhDc&feature=youtu.be


....

[sm0ky2]

From what is shown in the video, there is no suggestion there was any OU effect.

While the welding rods were sparking, the generator noise was going down. This suggests the spark has consumed quite a significant amount of energy from the generator.

There was certainly a current in the spark. We cannot assume that the current in the spark was zero. If the current in the spark was high, the circuit would heat up everything around and you would never get OU.

I find a more accurate description to be that the current through the output comes from induction.
And that the perpendicularly oriented magnetic field induced an opposing force on the generator.
It is the second part that actually "consumes" the power of the generator.


if you negate friction, the same occurs in a solid-state format through a transformer.


Electrostatic induction occurs without the perpendicular magnetic fields.


for the same reasons we raise the voltage of long-distance power lines.
magnetic field falls off with a drop in current.
but by raising the voltage, power levels remain the same.
We lose less by transforming it back down at the point of distribution.

[sm0ky2]

What I find to be interesting is by manipulating an electrostatic device
By choosing lightweight insulators
We quickly find 'problems' with the power equations.
especially when these machines are powered for long times using low-power
dc motors.


We know exactly the power consumed by the motor.
But attempts to calculate the power induced into the HV capacitors
do not conform to current theory.


The problem lies in the induced charge. Using capacitor duality,
we have a doubling of potential. Where does this come from?
the ambient?
0-point?
Or can it be related back into induction process?
If the latter is the case, then Maxwell was half-wrong,
or missing half of the information.