Kapanadze, Stepanov, Barbosa-Leal and the Secret of Free Energy

[Zeitmaschine]

INVESTIGATION IN PROGRESS

On November 08, 2011, 12:23 AM (as mentioned) cosmoLV displays a drawing regarding the Kapanadze device, showing somewhat that looks like a couple of tubes. On January 24, 2014, 12:34 PM some pictures were taken of a Barbosa-Leal device showing something that also looks like a tube, a closed looped pipe instead of a closed looped standard conductor. That pipe, which appears to be made of copper, is wrapped with insulation, maybe a shrinking hose or paint. They call it iron pipe, but one photo shows clearly a color like copper.

The standard conductor previously used by Barbosa-Leal is labeled »1x240.0MM2 0.6/1KV CCORE/PVC«, this marks a single core copper conductor with a cross section of 240mm², the PVC insulation is adequate for a voltage up to 1KV.

First question: Why putting together a lot of copper or iron fittings when a simple ground cable obviously can do it?

Second question: Why is it necessary to cover a pipe that heats up with something like PVC in its entirety? Seeing a bare copper or iron pipe would reveal nothing anyway.

Third question: How many turns can be made on an iron core using that kind of pipe or 240mm² conductor?

Fourth question: Does it stand to reason to connect a thin green ground wire to a bulky black ground wire about ten times the cross section?

Fifth question: The bulky black conductor wrapped with that thin green wire is the same conductor that forms the loop in front of the device? As we know already, there are many pitfalls.

The heavy current in the 240mm² cable or in the pipe generates an intense magnetic field in the iron core hidden within the device - not vice versa, it is rather not an intense magnetic field that generates the heavy current in that conductor.

Supposed - see question five - both are the same black cables, then something has to be wrapped around of that 240mm² cable inside of the device. Since that cable (and also the pipe) is connected galvanically to ground (negative) forming the cathode, then that wrapped-around thing has to be the anode (positive). On the other hand, if we connect an anode to high voltage negative against ground, then actually the ground would be the anode and the negative high voltage would be the cathode. The patent shows a closed loop with a plus sign, whereas one photo shows the closed loop (the pipe) connected to a red wire (ground?), so here the loop can't be the high voltage positive.

Thus, what is it, that has to be looped? The anode, the cathode or both? But if the loop is the cathode then the Barbosa-Leal patent drawing and description is wrong. Another pitfall?

[sm0ky2]

Are you certain that the patent is incorrect?


Tesla patented the same device in 20 completely different forms.
But they all performed the same basic function.


To claim one is wrong because it looks different than the other
Is to negate the operating principles, without first understanding them.

[kpannic]

Are you certain that the patent is incorrect?


Tesla patented the same device in 20 completely different forms.
But they all performed the same basic function.


To claim one is wrong because it looks different than the other
Is to negate the operating principles, without first understanding them.

which Tesla patent  u talking about?

[kpannic]

in video kapanadze 2004, the mystery of the two resistors and the white capacitor is in doubling the frequency .... the rest remains to be discovered......

[kpannic]

like video: