Kapanadze, Stepanov, Barbosa-Leal and the Secret of Free Energy

[forest]

partial explanation possible....field pulsed    very simple    you know how to pulse it - by HV capacitor discharge ; the simplest form = 2kV capacitor charged from secondary of MOT trafo through the spark gap at 100Hz thus two diodes

[leo48]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y8zSMXMo2hs

Is it possible that we can understand the connections in these transformers?

Leo48

[Zeitmaschine]

sm0ky2, that's why the phrase »or vice versa« is frequently used in this thread.


THE FOUR-CYCLE ENGINE

We use two transformers of a three-phase transformer. The primary coil of the first one is connected to 50Hz grid, generating a magnetic field. The secondary coil of that transformer is connected to ground and shorted. It is not shorted directly, but through a coil of the second transformer. That second transformer generates high voltage, for some reason at 100 Hz. That high voltage generates an electric field and ionization close to that shorted coil carrying the 50Hz current generated by the first transformer. Using a spark gap or not, what could happen? What could happen if we use all three transformers? The middle one generates the magnetic field and runs at 50Hz, the two outer ones provide the high voltage at 100Hz - or vice versa. What could happen, if the ground wire connected to the closed loop itself is influenced by an alternating electric field?

Unbelievable, how many pages can be written in circles about a device consistent of almost nothing.

It is still unclear at this point if a spark gap is really required or not. I can't see how a spark gap could ever work on a permanent basis when casted in epoxy resin, like the Barbosa-Leal device is. Should we assume there is a spark gap hidden in the circuit breaker or in one of the two surge arresters? Or is there an electronic one? But if we don't need one at all, then the better. Maybe Kapanadze's spark gap is just another pitfall - or he used one needlessly without knowing. Also it is still unclear at this point whether the surplus of electrons should be collected from ground or rather from ionized air.

Looking at the illustrations below, we know for sure now why a frequency doubler circuit is needed in order to generate the high voltage that attracts the electrons. It works (if we should ever succeed) like a four-cycle engine. The idea is to electrostatically attract and repel the electrons in a closed circuit in harmony with the magnetic field, not contrary to it, making one field cancel the other. So I think this is a physical configuration issue between the magnetic field(s) - inductance, and the electrostatic field(s) - capacitance. The Barbosa-Leal patent says »at least one device for generating an electromagnetic field (1) - powered by an electricity source«; that's an ordinary iron core wound with a primary coil. The secondary coil is the closed loop with 2 to 4 windings, generating heat (the copper pipe). This coil is not completely covered by the magnetic (and electric) field because we can see a large part of it sticking out of the device. So far we have here an ordinary transformer with a shorted secondary coil. That secondary coil is connected to ground. Exactly the same configuration like the welder above, which can turn the meter in reverse.

When an electric field attracts electrons (from ground) then it attracts electrons towards itself; the field generates a hot spot of electrons. Perhaps that could mean, we have to inject (»high voltage is injector«) those electrons directly into the magnetic field (»combustion chamber«) generated by the primary coil (»low voltage is piston«). Thus, it could be a good idea to have the ground wire connected near the magnetic field coil, not at an arbitrary spot somewhere on the closed loop. When this closed loop is made of a coaxial cable (wound around an iron core, magnetized by the primary coil), the shielding connected to high voltage attracts (or repels) electrons, but on one side of the circuit the electrons are always attracted (or repelled) in the wrong direction, the electrons do not move in a full circle. This can't work. What's missing?

[sm0ky2]

The spark gap is simply a switch
It is often replaced by a transistor
or similar state-dependent semiconductor


The purpose is to create an oscillating signal
If a/c is used at the source, this step is already
taken care of.

[Belfior]

it is not only a switch, since it provides a massive number of frequencies and their harmonics. This is an advantage if you mean to bounce these in a coil