Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Successfully looped SMOT

Started by postingsite, January 23, 2018, 09:58:00 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 5 Guests are viewing this topic.

TinselKoala

I see so much bullshit on these threads that it's hard to keep up with it all. But here I just have to step in:

Lap-gain is NOT "invariably catastrophic". Because certain drag or loss coefficients go up as the square or even higher powers of the speed, while "lap gain" may not. So a circling ball or rotor, under the influence of some kind of "free energy", may only speed up to the point where the various sources of drag now equal the magical input lap-gain, and from that point forward it will circle at a constant speed. Now if this speed is beyond the physical limitations of your apparatus due to sloppy building or something like that, then of course you may experience a catastrophe... but it is clearly not inevitable or invariable. 

I do cringe whenever I see people building rotating magnet structures without securely preventing any possible departures of the magnets from the apparatus.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4num28k4EnA

synchro1

Quote from: TinselKoala on February 19, 2018, 08:03:55 PM
I see so much bullshit on these threads that it's hard to keep up with it all. But here I just have to step in:

Lap-gain is NOT "invariably catastrophic". Because certain drag or loss coefficients go up as the square or even higher powers of the speed, while "lap gain" may not. So a circling ball or rotor, under the influence of some kind of "free energy", may only speed up to the point where the various sources of drag now equal the magical input lap-gain, and from that point forward it will circle at a constant speed. Now if this speed is beyond the physical limitations of your apparatus due to sloppy building or something like that, then of course you may experience a catastrophe... but it is clearly not inevitable or invariable. 

I do cringe whenever I see people building rotating magnet structures without securely preventing any possible departures of the magnets from the apparatus.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4num28k4EnA


Bullshit in Mandarin:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W9Z0hZuTfNU          废话

synchro1

Quote from: synchro1 on February 14, 2018, 08:25:44 AM
@Tinselkoala,

Do you feel the negative inductance measurement in this video is an indication of the presence of an increasing magnetic field in the one series bifilar coil of the "Quadfilar Spiral Torus"? We had a heated exchange about this subject last year as you probably remember.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uP2xEKH4qdc&list=UUo9ItsUt0n5ayZlb5K_cwaA&index=20

Tinselkoala,

I challenge you to replicate this kind of rising negative inductance measurement effect on your inductance meter or explain what's going on with mine.


sm0ky2

Quote from: TinselKoala on February 19, 2018, 08:03:55 PM

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4num28k4EnA


Interesting


How long did you let it run?
And at what velocity did the ball fly off the track?


Obviously we can have a system where the losses exceed the
acceleration, resulting in no more acceleration.
Thank you for emphasizing our ability to be inefficient.
I think you know that wasn't what I was talking about.


There's a reason I still haven't shared the device from '07
and I think I was clear with my statement above.


Partial information was given to 3 trusted replicators
but not the self-actuating mechanism
this is one of the experiments in that series
https://youtu.be/dkjY7qLH3PA
and if his hand could keep up with the increasing actuation speed
these magnets would fly around his room like the ones that nearly
killed me.
Go to my old house in Ks., there's still a ceramic-ferrite magnet
embedded in the 2x4, I couldn't remove it with vice grips so I
patched over the hole.


there will come a day, Mr. T
when you realize that I don't just pull stuff out of my ass


Just because you don't believe something, does not mean
your knowledge is complete.


It is far too exhausting to keep trying to prove things to you.
You say "no" to everything, without even looking at it.
Does that course of action make you happy?
Are you able to learn anything when you do that?


You are a very smart person, probably one of the few that I would
bow down to in the field of electronic engineering.
But you are hindering your own growth.
I was fixing a shower-rod, slipped and hit my head on the sink. When i came to, that's when i had the idea for the "Flux Capacitor", Which makes Perpetual Motion possible.

sm0ky2

We can tackle additive/exponential acceleration on another journey


Here, we are doing SMOT school


I believe we left off at: gate transition angles?


https://youtu.be/CXSVwvEKfAQ
I was fixing a shower-rod, slipped and hit my head on the sink. When i came to, that's when i had the idea for the "Flux Capacitor", Which makes Perpetual Motion possible.