Successfully looped SMOT

[TinselKoala]

Do you have a "successfully looped" SMOT, or not?

If not, then you are just another one of those people who pretend to teach what they cannot themselves do.

And I'm betting a cheezburger that the answer is "NO". Go ahead, prove me wrong.

[sm0ky2]

Here is an introduction video I made
Explaining the functional mechanism
or rather the piece of it that I feel is important
to begin with.


This magnetic situation can take on many shapes and forms
This is about the SMOT (or SMT),
So I will try to keep this contained to that set-up.


https://m.youtube.com/watch?feature=youtu.be&v=xCFHKMou3M8

[sm0ky2]

This is the same thing in a different set-up.
To give a more simplified perspective
the ball does not spin in this demo,
and there is only one magnetic array.
this is the north, but the south one does the same thing.


When both are employed, the force is increased.
with precision, two like fields can be used, adding another field compression dynamic.


https://m.youtube.com/watch?feature=youtu.be&v=cRVZ3aGxAdk

[sm0ky2]

This can be further simplified with just a ball and a single magnet.


the ball accelerates towards the magnet, and decelerates away from it.
If the velocity at the time of passing is too low, the field will attract the ball back in.
and it will stop at the point closest to the magnet.
If the velocity is great enough, the ball will sling-shot passed the magnet and fly off.


This is a time-dependent variable.


The rate of deceleration divided by the time it is at each point or division of the analyzed field.
The deceleration (or opposing acceleration) changes with distance.


when the change in distance entering and leaving are assymetrical, the force is also assymetrical.
The accelerating condition is different than the decelerating condition.


This is important, when the field symmetry is maintained, the potential energy through the
gradient is conservative. Energy in = energy out (-friction ) and the system fails.
the change in distance entering should occur gradually, and the distance leaving should increase
abruptly.


So that at the end of the transition, the attraction force falls off quickly.

[blueplanet]

You know what?
When I first came cross his bicycle wheel, I also felt agitated.
I also had[size=78%] a lot negative things to saying mind.[/size]
[size=78%]The only thing I cannot yell about is 30+ years of self-spinning.[/size]
[size=78%]For you, my only suggestion is to debunk it using your laws of science.[/size]
Period.

Google searched on it.  Got this -

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-4762778/How-riddle-bike-wheel-finally-solved.html

Quote

However, he made it clear from the start that his machines were fake, calling himself a 'court jester in the palace of science'. Dr Jones, who lived in Jesmond, Newcastle, said that he had included 'conjuring tricks' and 'cunning distractions', and scientists had been 'remarkably gullible' in failing to solve the riddle.