Successfully looped SMOT

[sm0ky2]

The point of referencing the magneticians in my previous post
Was not to make people go follow Ken like the guru he would be.
But to show everyone that all of the people on that list
Say exactly the same things, in their own perspectives,
That I have shown here, in a language a 3rd grader should be able
to understand.


The problem isn't HJ's technology
It's people's inability to comprehend it.
That's what I'm trying to fix here.


Greg Watson learned from Howard Johnson, just like the rest of us.
But it's confusing, because it is different from the way magnetic theory is explained.




What science admits to "knowing" about magnetics, exists in the same 3 paragraphs
in textbooks that have been there for generations, copied from book to book.


The magnetic field is invisible, untastable, unfeelable, unsmellable, unhearable.


It is bipolar, having a north and a south


North repels north, south repels south.


North and south attract each other.


Some people can be satisfied and content with this pebble of knowledge.
The rest of us become magniticians.


When we stop learning, science has no use for us.

[TinselKoala]

You are so wrong it's not even funny any more. I used to give you a score of 80% right, 20% wrong, but you've boosted your "wrong" score considerably today.

When you actually understand how that green magnetic-field-viewing stuff works, you'll see how nonsensical Kenny's claims about "dielectric inertial plane" are.

Nothing, and I mean nothing, has ever been engineered using the fake silly ideas promulgated by KW. Just look at the claims about bismuth and a magnet producing a temperature rise! Ridiculous, disproven by real experiments over and over, artifacts of his camera that are actually even warned about in the camera manufacturer's own literature... yet he still has not retracted his silly claim.

Smoky, you do yourself (and the rest of us) no favours by endorsing that kind of nonsense.

[TinselKoala]

This SMOT is made using a very large steel ball.


This sphere is hollow, and was originally a non-magnetic 305 stainless steel.
I have restructured the crystalline structure
From Austenite to martensite
By placing it in a Leedskalnin PMH loop.


What's important here, is the large diameter of the sphere
And the effects the accelerating outer surface have on rotational momentum.
In relation to the linear displacement of the ball, through the field.


https://youtu.be/Owkz6w4AhRM


Don't worry, I'm not going to loop a smot of giant balls,
But I wanted to show you this in exaggerated form to demonstrate
the effects of changing the size of sphere in your particular design.

No, you didn't change any crystalline structure by putting your balls into a Leedskalnin PMH.

I have those balls too, and without any treatment by me, I can see that they are slightly ferromagnetic around the seam where the two hemispheres are joined together (call this the equator) and less so the further away from the equator you get. It's easy to reproduce your demonstration with my sphere, which has not been subjected to any Leedskalnin fantasy treatment.

[sm0ky2]

No, you didn't change any crystalline structure by putting your balls into a Leedskalnin PMH.

I have those balls too, and without any treatment by me, I can see that they are slightly ferromagnetic around the seam where the two hemispheres are joined together (call this the equator) and less so the further away from the equator you get. It's easy to reproduce your demonstration with my sphere, which has not been subjected to any Leedskalnin fantasy treatment.

I'm not sure why you are willing to argue against that
(unless you just like saying nay with no logical reasoning)
But it is easy to prove that the pmh changes the magnetic
properties of ANYTHING!
Including copper, aluminum, wood, plastics, etc.
Build one, test it.
See the PMH thread I have been recently posting to,
see David Lambright's YouTube channel
He was the one who discovered this. and it is repeatable and verifiable.
Stick anything in a pmh loop for several hours and it is paramagnetic.
Leave it for longer and it becomes ferromagnetic. Regardless of what it is.


When I first got my set of 9 hollow spheres, for use as electrostatic conductors
the first thing I did was test them for magnetism.
None of the magnets had ANY effect on the metal, except my strongest neo
and that magnet would only stick slightly, falling off from its own weight.


Now even my weak SmCo magnets stick to the ball, move the ball, etc.
Which they definitely did not do, before leaving it in the pmh loop overnight.


You are right about the seams, any holes drilled into them, or areas that have
been heated to extreme temperatures during manufacturing
and that is why I test them when I get them.
any magnetism in the spheres changes the properties of the electrostatic spark.
The sparks take on a different color, and even shoot off in strange directions
In "electrostatics", I consider these effects to be unnecessary losses.


And for the record, the PMH did not belong to Leedskalnin
He stole that experiment from the British Royal Society publications
As he did with every one of his experiments in his book or that he showed
to the public at his castle.
Remember, we're talking about a guy that got his training from Robert Ripley himself.
There is nothing "fantasy" about the PMH, outside  Leedskalnin's writings.


I have no reason to argue with you about that.
You have no evidence to back up your claims of "nay"


It is what it is.
Everything is magnetic.
Deal with it

[sm0ky2]

https://youtu.be/pkD2qD3xOTA


https://youtu.be/pkD2qD3xOTA


Any questions?


This was 10 yrs ago, since then we have magnetized
everything under the sun
(solids anyways, I have plans for liquids but not sure yet how to go about it)