Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



user TURBO?s replication of Steven Mark?s TPU ?

Started by turbo, November 29, 2006, 04:13:49 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 16 Guests are viewing this topic.

z_p_e

This is what I suspect will be seen with the test, and with the bulb wire going outside the coil, not inside. Whether there is a difference with the wire running inside the coil remains to be seen from actual test results.

When the MOSFET is ON, there is a voltage division between the coil's series resistance (0.5 Ohm) and the ON resistance of the MOSFET.

When the MOSFET turns OFF, there is a cemf spike (100's of volts), and the voltage across the bulb goes to the full 12V because the MOSFET is no longer pulling down the voltage.

I have calculated the 50-turn coil inductance to be approximately 100uH, and the series resistance to be 0.5 Ohms. Also, the bulb resistance I set to 50 Ohms. These are approximate values, and changing any of these variables of course changes the peak voltage of the cemf spikes etc, but the picture remains more or less the same.

I used a frequency of 200Hz, 50% duty square wave.

If anyone would like to suggest any different values for any of the above, I'd be glad to re-run the simulation...it only takes a second.

Conclusion: There is nothing new or unusual about these results. Maybe the actual test will reveal something different.

Darren

starcruiser

Try it with 170 turns of 26AWG for the control. the rest can be the same.

Let us us know what you get please.
Regards,

Carl

z_p_e

Starcruiser, I assume you're talking to me?

If you or someone could measure your coil resistance and inductance, that would be far easier and accurate. As a minimum, measure the resistance. Providing the coil length, radius, and how many layers, and turns per layer if possible would be great.

I hate guessing if I can avoid it. Give me numbers please.

In the mean time, I'll see if I can figure out an approximate value of inductance and resistance for this request.

Darren

z_p_e

OK, I did a quick and rough calculation of the new Inductance and Resistance with 176 turns of #26.

Inductance ~ 517uH
Resistance ~ 1.76 Ohms

Spikes now peak out at 240Vp.

Darren

starcruiser

Regards,

Carl