user TURBO?s replication of Steven Mark?s TPU ?

[dean_mcgowan]

Ouch...

I am very interested in the passing of information  ... and what does the drip feed method achieve other than to make the little baby birds begging for each scrap that you might wish to share, hope to achieve other than your own self agrandoisment.

I could sprout all the crap you have been sharing in a heartbeat, but the fact is I know that its not the real answer because i have done enough research and tried enough experiments to know it doesnt work .. so now i raise you one and call you to shut the hell up yourself or post a some detailed information as you have been requested to, including schematics, scope shots, meter readings etc that might earn you a little piece of street cred back after your appaling behaviour of late.

Lay your cards on the table. Mine are still all posted here.. unedited, not removed, truthful (outspoken maybe) and signed with my real name. You see, the truth has nothing to fear or hide.

Regards,

Dean

[dean_mcgowan]

PS .. where did turbo go ?

[CTG Labs]

Dean,

You can take it all as you wish.  You can ignore it if you wish.  Whatever you feel really doesnt effect me in anyway.  I dont really care about street cred as you put it and I dont really care what the people on this forum think of me, its all water off a ducks back.  There is no onus on me because I not here to proove anything to anyone.  If you dont want the info, or the small scraps then dont take them.  I am not gaining from this in anyway, I dont want anything from anyone, you can believe what you want, thats your choice isnt it?  So, I gave some scraps, I didnt have to give any.  If you think its crap because you have already done it, then why dont you proove to the other guys that it is crap?  Or show them your research to show I am talking crap, after all you are the expert arent you, Im just a measly morsal, a god damn insolent specimen?

At the end of the day, what I post or dont shouldn't affect you in anyway, if you dont believe anything I say, why do you get so wound up about it?  Why do you even bother to reply to my posts?  What is wrong with you?

You can raise me all you like, but I am not in a game to win anything and I really dont care what you think.

What exactly do you want?

[Dingus Mungus]

Wow I think I just had some sort of Epiphany...
If you play any one frequency and a sub harmonic of that frequency you create a resonant harmonic beat each time the peaks of both frequencies sync up. Now if you add a subharmonic of the created resonant beat frequency you create more than 2 resonant beats... Rather, you create many harmonic beats for each active frequency dependant on which peaks from which frequency or harmonic beat sync up... basically three properly selected frequencies can create at least 6 instances of harmonic resonance per accumulative cycle.

example:
F1+F2 = H1
F2+F3 = H2
F1+F3 = H3
F2+H3 = H4
F1+H2 = H5
F3+H1 = H6

Note: I'm thinking of this in terms of audio frequencies... Also this layout only demonstrates harmonies created with at least one user input frequency, and that means it doesn't take subharmonics of the beats in to account. I will work tonight on creating some 3 frequencies simulations of my theory. Hope my computer doesn't explode or levitate!


Hmmmmmm... I'm pretty invested in another project right now but I might have to go buy a scope soon. Electronics are not one of my strong points but I the more I think about this project the more feasible it sounds. I wish there was something a little more conclusive published...

Good luck to all just starting their research,
Many thanks to those users leading the group,
~Dingus

[CTG Labs]

Dingus, perhaps you could ask our lord and master, it seems I am talking crap so you better not listen to anything I say.