user TURBO?s replication of Steven Mark?s TPU ?

[Groundloop]

[EDIT] Deleted.

[konduct]

Hey guys.  Not sure if you guys have figured out the magic frequency spread or not, but I would think harmonic or resonant music notes/chords might work for your needs.  Octave notes would be a good start with a harmonic in between and you could transpose according to the configuration of your coil.  Here is a link to some higher frequency / note conversion with wavelengths.

http://www.phy.mtu.edu/~suits/notefreqs.html  

As well as a more thorough chart here
http://www.contrabass.com/pages/frequency.html

Maybe, maybe not...some numbers to consider.  I use several different synthesisers with many channels and polyphony and a computer to record music.  Got me thinking about getting into these coil setups now.

[CTG Labs]

well x i sent you my postal details, and when i figure out how to make it work like you did and connected a light blub or receive help from you or others, i will feel motivated to borrow my brothers camera, showing a light bulb connected to a lamp with a 3 socket plug, over here, and then use the tpu you send if you do send, to blast these doubters to kingdom come, and make them go '' hmm whats going on here''.

Overunity or not, it will move doubt and confusion some more.

GAH!  I guess you didn't read that post either.  SOME ONE ALREADY POSTED AND WON THE TPU!


Dave.

[turbo]

That's simple to answer Dave

When you post videos on an open forum, like the OVERUNITY FORUM and constantly imply that you have discovered a new form of energy, greater than the source (the battery), Then as you say don't owe the forum members anything, what is the point?

Sparkman, if you were building coils before Marco was even born then I guess you have all the answers?  Why do you come here at all and waste your time with the children who don't know anything and must be faking it all?  (not a dig, an honest question).

Simple again Dave, I don't have all the answers, because I'm not making any claims that I have a overunity device. I come here to expose a charlatan that is trying to pretend and imply he has something producing overunity. This is my point of view based on my experience.

Now I'm not talking about you Dave, as you have come clean and admitted that you don't have an OU device.

Why hasn't Marco come clean and admit that what he is doing is neither new or unique as anyone with lots of experience around Tesla coils knows this.

Here is an open question to Marco to "fess up" with a yes or no answer.

On behalf of everyone who may be interested in truth:

Do you have an overunity device ?

This requires only a simple yes or no

I'm sure he will slither out of a direct yes or no answer and say "my videos tell the truth" but we will never know what "truth" he is talking about.

The gauntlet has been thrown down. Your turn professori

sparkman:

you as an well experienced tesla coil builder should have to be able to awnser that question youreself, since you are assuming it has all been done before and so you say, nothing new....

now when we look at the name of the device, tesla's magnifying transmitter, and we wonder why he called it this way , the awnser would be simple.

it's because the reciever puts out more energy then is deliverd to the tranmitter.

so basicly we can say that a tesla magnifying transmitter in proper operation is an overunity device.

since you claim you read all the posts you did also read about the part where i explain it is made up of MODIFIED tesla coils, now what would that mean?

the origional model was developed to deliver energy anywhere on the planet by transmitting it somewhere else.

later on things got really intresting when people started thinking about tuning the recievers to natural sources evreywhere present....

this would mean the transmitter would completly dissaper , leaving us with a reciever only.......

Now ,if you start thinking about what i just told you instead of asking questions about claims i never made, hence maybe further devellop the works of tesla himself, who knows what can be done.

i am not at this stage YET , a reciever tuned ONLY to a natural source ,the video's are just there to show im working on it and its getting better.

i know there are people looking at them and thinking hey maybe i can try it like this..or like that..

then people like yourself begin talking and i think maybe i should not post anything at all, but i refuse, because there is a lot waiting for us to be discoverd.

it is not to claim one has a overunity device, its about adding something to a process called development, but you seemd to have missed that one.

i am sorry for you.

Turbo

[konduct]