Monopoles, by only using Permanent-magnets

[postingsite]

    UPDATE - I made some corrections to this post

Monopoles, by only using Permanent-magnets

The best I have found on the internet, are :

-  The monopole spherical device, created at the university of barcelona,  however,  that needs to be super-cooled, to turn it into a super-conductor,  for it to function
     Also,  when you examine the usual diagram showing it's field-lines,  it does seem as if those field-lines  curve on both sides of the device,  and you sort of think that they may meet outside of the diagram,   therefore behaving like a normal magnet
       You would expect video demonstrations of this device,  and it's effect and range,  on other  permanent-magnets and metal objects,  but there seem to be no videos   

-  And the other design I found,   is the video below, and is only a software simulation,  however,  for such a simple design,  it is very impressive :
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K09FFxsgtsQ

_______  _______

  My designs are on the diagram below
     However, I have noticed that at least one of my designs is similar to an already available,  cheap,  claimed Monopole-Permanent-Magnet  product on the internet,  even before I posted it this week (  and I doubt that I posted or designed many of my designs before the last week or so   )

    In the diagram :
     - Monopole-Design-A  -  Is a side-view of a Cone-Shaped-Permanent-Magnet,  that has a hollow shaft running through it's center

     - Monopole-Design-B  -  Is a side-view,  and is an attempt to copy and design a 3D version of the one in the video :
        https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K09FFxsgtsQ

     - Monopole-Design-C  -  Is a side-view of a   Solid Cone-Shaped-Permanent-Magnet

     - Monopole-Design-D  -  Is a side-view of a Cone-Shaped-Permanent-Magnet,  that has a different hollow shaft running through it's center,  to that of  'Monopole-Design-A'

     - Monopole-Design-E  -  Is a side-view -  'Magnet-W' is inside the  hollow shaft of  'Cylinder-Permanent-magnet-'Magnet-X', 
          I THOUGHT AN  EFFECTIVE  MODIFICATION WITH THIS DESIGN IS TO :
          - Just seal of one end of 'Cylinder-Permanent-magnet-'Magnet-X' 
              -  However, the small magnet inside the cylinder may connect with the opposite end of the large cylinder,  something that may happen regardless of blocking of one end of the large cylinder ,  I don't know .
              -  The only problem with this solution is that it blocks the type of energy flow( from the external environment ? ) effect through the magnet that I was hoping for  .
             - You could also have a long  'Rectangular-Shaped-Permanent-magnet-'Magnet-X'  and a rectangular  'Magnet-W'
         
     - Monopole-Design-F - Is an attempt the play with the relevant strengths at the ends of the magnet,  and try and put an awkwardly long thin weak link between them

     - Monopole-Design-G  -  I only made this design to show the idea of using  hollow-shafts  to try and mix different fields

     - Monopole-Design-H  - 

_______  _______

   So obviously the aim of my designs is to produce some type of   'coherent'  magnetic beam / ray,   just by using  'Permanent-Magnets',   by  not allowing the 2 poles of the permanent-magnet to connect with each other,  as illustrated on my  2nd diagram,   below

   Just to clarify,  that my  Monopole-Permanent-Magnet   designs,   may not be the same thing as the standard definition of a  magnetic-monopole ,    since the standard definition of a magnetic-monopole may be like a  sphere ( like a proton ) radiating out a single field out in ALL directions,  like a proton

    The  2nd diagram below,  is a diagram of my version of the magnetic-field of my versions of Monopole-Permanent-Magnets
    (  NOTE - In 2nd diagram below,   I have not used my designs for Monopole-Permanent-Magnets ,    instead,    I just show a normal  'Non-Monopole' Permanent-Magnet,  in order to make it easier to see the  monopole fields I want to try and achieve 

[sm0ky2]

Two things


First, magnetic monopoles were successfully created 5 years ago
Here's one of the 3 methods that I know of for "at-Home" creation
there are other, more advanced methods that require a lab.


https://youtu.be/rOdTDkgEdAY


Second, if you dig through the "tri-force" threads on this forum
~8-9 yrs ago someone here discovered how the tri-force can create
a singular-pole magnetic beam. (magnetic laser)
Enabling the normal 2-3 inch field to be extended several meters.
North in one direction, south split in two other corners of a triangle,
vice versa, or in another arrangement, a singular opposite pole vectored
at an angle (not 180-degrees)

[sm0ky2]

What I would like to know is


What is the design for "perpetual motion"
That we have always heard magnetic monopoles
are supposed to be capable of? ?


Playing with them, they are nothing more than 1/2
of a magnetic dipole.
But in all effect, behave like one side of a normal magnet.
If it is a north monopole, it attracts south and repels north
and if it's a south, it attracts north and repels south.


I haven't found anything special about them, except that they
appear to be missing their other pole....


Experiments confirm my suspicions, that they behave similar to electric charges.

If magnetic monopoles could create perpetual motion, then electric charges
would do the same.
But they don't.

[truesearch]

@sm0ky2


I noticed your post above:

Second, if you dig through the "tri-force" threads on this forum[/size]~8-9 yrs ago someone here discovered how the tri-force can createa singular-pole magnetic beam. (magnetic laser)Enabling the normal 2-3 inch field to be extended several meters.North in one direction, south split in two other corners of a triangle,vice versa, or in another arrangement, a singular opposite pole vectoredat an angle (not 180-degrees)

After doing some searching I wasn't able to find a diagram/drawing of that ~ do you have an image or can you point me to one?

truesearch

[postingsite]

Second, if you dig through the "tri-force" threads on this forum
~8-9 yrs ago someone here discovered how the tri-force can create
a singular-pole magnetic beam. (magnetic laser)
Enabling the normal 2-3 inch field to be extended several meters.
North in one direction, south split in two other corners of a triangle,
vice versa, or in another arrangement, a singular opposite pole vectored
at an angle (not 180-degrees)

   I can not find( details below ) any mention of the  Permanent-magnet-laser  you mentioned,  although I searched via google rather than reading all through the threads,    a direct-link  or  diagrams would function  .

   If that was done only using  Permanent-magnets, it is exactly why I am currently interested in  Monopoles,  for a  Permanent-magnet-laser  done by only using  permanent-magnets,   not for  magnet-motors .

   This seems somehow much bigger( in a different way ) than  overunity-generators or perpetual-motion ,  imagine if a   permanent-magnet-laser did work,   and you put it on a balloon 2-km in altitude,  maybe the  permanent-magnet-laser  could reach to the earth (  since there's no metallic material absorbing it in the sky )

   I have tried putting the text below( and other similar searches ),   in  Google-normal-search,  and in  Google-image-search,   but have not found the "singular-pole magnetic beam(magnetic laser)"  in the  tri-force threads,  or anywhere on overunity.com   :

   "tri-force"   "beam"  site:.overunity.com
   "singular pole" "magnetic beam"  site:.overunity.com

What I would like to know is


What is the design for "perpetual motion"
That we have always heard magnetic monopoles
are supposed to be capable of? ?


Playing with them, they are nothing more than 1/2
of a magnetic dipole.
But in all effect, behave like one side of a normal magnet.
If it is a north monopole, it attracts south and repels north
and if it's a south, it attracts north and repels south.


I haven't found anything special about them, except that they
appear to be missing their other pole....


Experiments confirm my suspicions, that they behave similar to electric charges.

If magnetic monopoles could create perpetual motion, then electric charges
would do the same.
But they don't.

   I can see why people may have wanted a monopole,  for the simplest  magnet-motor  design,  where  a  rectangular-magnet-stator,    only has it's side( not the N or S pole ) facing directly to the center of the rotating-wheel .
       But I thought that even with a  monopole,  that there would still be  a sticky-point  .

    I don't know if  magnetic-monopoles could create  perpetual-motion,  but what about an  electrostatic  version  of  "magnet-motor-3.5"   .
       If the triangular-components  on  "magnet-motor-3.5"  where  only  electrostatically-charged  material,   would the stators( electrostatic  versions )  below them try and go the the thickest-part  of the  electrostatically-charged-triangle.
    Note : On the  normal  magnetic version  of  "magnet-motor-3.5",   only 3 or 4 triangles would have to be  permanent-magnets,  the little-square-stators could just be metal( not permanent-magnets ) .

    Strangely, I can no longer load the  overunity.com  pages containing "magnet-motor-3.5",  by clicking the images that come up from putting the following text,   in a  Google-image-search :

        "magnet-motor-3.5"  site:.overunity.com/

     That search also brings up a diagram of an updated version of  "magnet-motor-3.5"

   The problem may be that the announced website rennovations on  overunity.com ,   may have caused some links to stop working

    The following link goes straight to a post containing that motor :
    http://overunity.com/15774/permanent-magnet-motor/msg475921/#msg475921