12 times more output than input, dual mechanical oscillation system !

[fletcher]

Omnibus .. this is what you fail to understand.

When the lever is primed Work is Done on it i.e. F x D in Joules - call that the Input Energy in Joules.

The wheel is Out of Balance [OOB] at start position so it has torque & rotates - it releases Pe as it rotates to bdc gaining Ke - it has velocity as it passes bdc & enough Ke & momentum to make a revolution or three which you see & interpret as a demonstration of CoE violation [it is NOT].

Everyone else see's that whilst it makes a few revolutions the Rotational Ke = 1/2mv^2 [in Joules] of the wheel is slightly less than the Input Energy Work Done [in Joules] you primed it with - each revolution has slightly less residual Ke [in Joules] than the original Input Energy Work Done [in Joules] loaded into the system !

So, Input Energy plus Pe = Rot Ke less Losses.

N.B.1. With NO Input Energy, there is NO long run down time while it's used up !

N.B.2. It is legitimate to use Input Energy [Work Done] to start a wheel - but Output Energy [Work Done] must be greater than or at least equal to Input Energy PLUS losses - substantially greater to do useful Work & then you have violated CoE.

Check these things in your experiment !

-----------------------------------------------

Mark .. the Milkovich dual pendulums face the same scenario outlined above - the pendulum has Work Done on it i.e. F x D [in joules], to prime it - it oscillates & the Work Output less losses [in Joules] is slightly less than Work Input Work Done Energy [in Joules].

The Output Energy is progressively slightly less each oscillation than the original Input Energy with small losses, else it could do work & self sustain itself.

The bendini coil is just a more efficient way of slowing down losses IMO.

[MrMag]

I will carry out an experiment sometime this or next month and will make a video to demonstrate this important instance of CoE violation.

Translation: Hopefully in two months you will forget I made this statement.

[WilbyInebriated]

@fletcher
nota bene: omnem dimittite spem, o vos dicere cum omnibus.

[Omnibus]

When in the two cases the weights are set at the same h and they are left at rest there that means that the priming done is the same for each one of them. That should be obvious. The only difference is the construction but that doesn't take part when energy balance is done. Everything else follows from the clear understanding of that pivotal point -- the equality of the initial potential energy in each one of the cases. The difference further on, once the said equality is understood well, is self-evident. If CoE were not violated there should be no difference further down the line under these initial conditions -- the initial equality of the gravitational potential energy in each case.

[fletcher]

Hope is one thing Wilby, delusion is another.

Omnibus will find his waterloo soon enough when he does the experiments.