12 times more output than input, dual mechanical oscillation system !

[ltseung888]

But Lawrence, the unbalanced cylinder will have the effect of needing more energy to rotate until the heavy point reaches 12:00, and then you can get "extra" energy as it rotates beyond this point.  However, you will not get more energy than it took to rotate the unbalanced cylinder to the 12:00 position...less due to friction.

How is this a way to "lead out" free energy due to gravity?

Bill

Build yourself a Chan Wheel.  Balance it.  You will not lift the Weight no matter what speed you rotate it.  You can pump as much energy as you like into it.

Unbalance it.  You will be able to lift the weight easily the Milkovic 2SO style. 

Go for full rotations.  Observe the much greater height lifted in some "random" times.  This is similar to the effect of pushing the swing randomly.

Rotate the unbalanced cylinder faster.  You will find Egavity.  When the rotation is too slow, Egravity will not be greater than Eloss.

I believe the rpm should be at least 300 before the Egravity effect is clearly observed.

*** you should also note that many reported LESS input power was needed after the unbalanced arm started rotating at a steady (resonance?) speed.

[ltseung888]

The modified Chas Campbell system.

The components may be moved to adjust the tension of the belts.

Need to specified the frame structure.  Later.

The concept is getting clearer.

Can we bring-in enough Egravity with this setup?

Hopefully, the shaking will be limited to the Unbalanced Cylinder.

[ltseung888]

From Patrick Kelly's Book.

I am not surprised if Chas Campbell tried the self run. With tinkering, it may work some of the time. 

With the Tsinghua setup and the Lead-out energy to back up, it will work all the time.

I like Patrick's words:

Where excess energy is flowing in from the local environment.

[noonespecial]

Must the cylinders be mounted in fixed bearings? Is it possible for the belt or chain mechanism to introduce some room for vibration or oscillation?

If such oscillations lead-out gravitational energy, can the Tsinghua University energy multiplier or Chas Campbell setup transfer such lead-out energy to the Generator (keeping the amplitude of such oscillations very low)?

The bearings must be fixed or they would never survive. If the bolts holding the bearings, are even slightly loose the vibrations will fatigue the metal and they will fail in a short period of time. I know from personal experience.

Its possible I suppose to mount the cylinder on fixed bearings which are securely bolted to a solid, highly sprung platform. This is the only way that I can see this working.

[ltseung888]

I have been thinking about the best way to explain the concept of lead-out energy.

The diagram is one of the attempts.

This time, I approach it from the Raymond Head video on the Milkovic 2SO.  The focus is on the force due to rotation.  The force due to rotation will change the tension in the string and is often referred to as the centripetal or centrifugal force.

In the explanation, we just treat this force as contributing to the tension of the string.  It may increase the tension or decrease the tension.

Increasing the tension can be thought of as increasing the weight.  Decreasig the tension can be thought of as decreasing the weight.  In other words, the object falls down with greater weight and bounces up with less weight.  This will make the object rise higher with each bounce (the trampoline effect?)  This will surely lead-out or bring-in gravitational energy.

The lead-out gravitational energy is dependent on the force.  The factors affecting the force are mass, radius and angular velocity.  The angular velocity (or rotational speed) is the most important.

The Tsinghua University Energy Multiplier is the best implementation.