12 times more output than input, dual mechanical oscillation system !

[ltseung888]

Prayer: "What are the Meaningful Economic Activities intended for me?"


1.  Who can develop and defend the Lee-Tseung Lead-out Energy Theory after listening to Lee Cheung Kin?
2.  Who can Look at the Milkovic 2SO video and improve with the Chan Wheel?
3.  Who can look at the Tsinghua University Energy Multiplier and defend it as a QMOGEN?
4.  Who can look at the rumors or reports of the UFO and developed the King David Sling Technology?
5.  Who can read the International Space Agency solid mass centrifugal propulsion system posts and improve it with the electromagnetic version?

Do not waste time on doing the experiment by myself.  Let others shine!!!

China and USA Governments may have no choice but to disclose the top secrets to benefit the World...  The floodgate is open for other Nations - India, Russia, Japan etc...

Everyone has a role to play in His Divine Plan.  Receive and Serve the Wine...

Lawrence
reply 3156

[Mr XYZ]

AMEN to that!

[PIH123]

Hi Larry,

Remember this from just over two weeks ago.

According to you, Organization X had already found greater torque when adding the unbalanced wheel. And they were already testing different generators.
They were going to run for two weeks before they publish the data.


So ?

How is it going ? Where are their data ?

Thought I would have seen them on the news by now.

Larry, answer please.

Have Organization X found greater torque when adding the unbalanced wheel.
You said they had and would have documented evidence in two weeks.
It is now more than 3 weeks.


If you do not answer, I will assume you made that up (and hence have no problem inventing stuff to meet your agenda).


And if you are really using this topic as a reference for all of your contacts, they will see this too.

Regards (but for not much longer)

Pete

[ltseung888]

Larry, answer please.

Have Organization X found greater torque when adding the unbalanced wheel.
You said they had and would have documented evidence in two weeks.
It is now more than 3 weeks.


If you do not answer, I will assume you made that up (and hence have no problem inventing stuff to meet your agenda).


And if you are really using this topic as a reference for all of your contacts, they will see this too.

Regards (but for not much longer)

Pete

I am not the spokesperson for any organization including Organization X.  They read this thread and are free to post as they please.

You can assume what you want.  I stick to the lead-out energy flying saucer...

[ltseung888]

After looking at the ISA solid mass centrifugal propulsion design for awhile, it occurred to me that we may have another way to generate lift.

We can take away the impact mechanism and replace it with an energy take-out mechanism.  This is easy with moving magnets.  The velocity at the top can be much higher than the velocity at the bottom.

See the attached diagram.


Lawrence
reply 3156

In reply 3286, the energy supply mechanism can be an electromagnet.  The energy take-away mechanism can be a coil to convert the motion to electricity.  If properly designed, the take-away mechanism can provide energy to the energy supply mechanism.  Some additional energy may be needed to overcome losses.  The additional energy may come from a lead-out energy source.

The vessel can be orientated in any direction.

I did a quick patent search and did not find anything.  However, I shall not apply for any patents.  I just disclose the information for the benefit of the World.

Divine wine is for all to share.  Anyone can post, cheer or jeer.

*** Anyone with experience on pulse motors can design and perform the prove-of-concept experiment.  Let them shine...

The physics is clear and simple.  It is just an accelerating and decelerating magnet inside a circular path.  The centrifugal force will be higher when the velocity or angular velocity is higher.  In one complete revolution, the velocity on one side can be much higher than that on the other side.  The formula is the simple mv*v/R.  If we vary v, the force will be different.

I regard this as a Divine Revelation.  A human being cannot be that smart.

Lawrence
reply 3156