12 times more output than input, dual mechanical oscillation system !

[ltseung888]

This design owes a fair amount to the Robert Adams motor.

As a generator, it is interesting - particularly if you reclaim collapsed field energy - but I cannot see any shaft wobble propelling anything.

I think you should sideline all this space ship stuff and stick to energy generators where they is likely to be more mileage.

We all learn from the past.  However, the key in this case is the timing of the exact pulse to drive the permanent magnet.  Looks like we need to seek more.

Patrick Kelly's Book chapter 2.1 gave a good description of the Adams Motor.  Where else should we look?

[memoryman]

SO STOP TALKING AND BUILD SOMETHING, Lawrence. This is more utter nonsense.

[Paul-R]

Patrick Kelly's Book chapter 2.1 gave a good description of the Adams Motor.  Where else should we look?

On the  next page. That is the key drawing.

[ltseung888]

On the  next page. That is the key drawing.

The late Robert Adams might not have found the key.  The key, I believe, is the precise moment  to produce the high repulsion.  Patrick Kelly tried to find an alternative to avoid the high precision.  (We did the same stupid thing with the Tong Wheel.)  The 225 HP Pulse Motor did better.

The attached diagram is a familiar experiment done by many researchers.

Why would the same Input of Energy produce over 1,000 times the repulsion force?  Can the recovered Output Energy be more than Input under the appropriate conditions?

Lawrence
reply 3354 3355

[ltseung888]

Ninth Design of the Flying Saucer

Since the Magnet in a Donut Tube engineering is difficult, the ninth design makes it easier for the garage mechanic.

1. The normal wheel type arrangement is used.
2. The Magnet is repelled by the Drive Coil to obtain additional energy and velocity.  One or more collectors will drain the energy and slow down the velocity.
3. Starting can be via rotation of the axle.
4. The difference in angular velocity will give higher CF force on top.
5. Net force is upwards.  (Net weight expected to decrease when the unbalanced wheels spins with higher angular velocity at top than at bottom.)

Can a garage mechanic really build such a device?  Will some Hong Kong or China machine shops do it?

Lawrence
reply 3354 3355

The ninth design is better in the following ways:
1.  There is no need for the permanent magnet to travel at high velocity inside a tube.  There will be no friction nor heat problems.
2.  It is relatively easy to change the permanent magnet that may be rod shaped. It may be clamped or have holes to provide solid mounting.
3.  The arm can be rotated and started by hand.
4.  There is no need for precision engineering of the donut.

There is still the need for precision pulsing to provide the repulsion.  But this may be at a fixed position when the magnet passes.  Let someone suggest such a mechanism...

Open development has its virtues.

Lawrence
reply 3354 3355