12 times more output than input, dual mechanical oscillation system !

[Mollieman]

Hello people, I am new to your site but have being checking out ou devices for some time now.
This one looks promising. Think about this, Use a powerful permant magnet for the pendulium, place an electromagnet at one end of the stroke, pulse the emagnet with a spring switch actuated by pendulium shaft, some adjustment would have to be done to determine the # of strokes the pendulium would freefall before the emagnet assist would be needed, but I think the final device could be used to power a generator.

ANYBODY WHO DOES NOT BELIEVE IN PERPETUAL MOTION HAS NEVER SEEN THE SUN!

[acp]

Hello mollieman, welcome to overunity.com......

Can you draw a diagram to help explain your idea? A thousand pics are worth a single word etc. thousand er whatever it was...... a picture is worth a th...

ANYBODY WHO DOES NOT BELIEVE IN PERPETUAL MOTION HAS NEVER SEEN THE SUN!

Can you elaborate on this?

Regards

Albert

[i_ron]

By the output side I mean the longer side opposite the pendulum. Is the device more efficient if more weight is added to this side, or is that detrimental?

For those who are testing this device, remember: the potential energy input into the pendulum (in joules) is found by the formula mgh m=mass of pendulum (in kg) g=9.8 m/s h=height in meters that the center of mass of the pendulum is raised.

Although Milkovic's flashlight experiment was somewhat helpful, the part where he showed that the flashlight used for the input powered 9 others was unconvincing. He obviously input more energy then required to light the one flashlight on each stroke because his hand+the flashlight had kinetic energy when it struck the pendulum.

Not so. His hand + the flashlight was not in contact with the pendulum, only
the sprung lever actually makes contact.

The secondary lever is akin to a teeter totter. two boys of equal weight at an
equal distance make it go with a modest kick off of one pair of legs.

One fat man and one small boy can still teeter totter if you adjust the fulcrum.

If you add too much weight to the output side in a Veljko device the pendulum will
not lift it.

The output side of the secondary arm has two strokes, an up and a down.

Think of it this way if you wish... the pendulum, on it's down stroke, lifts the
counter weight. Gravity lowers the counter weight on the pendulum's up stroke.

You can extract this resulting force equally on both strokes, or bias it to favor one
or the other stroke.

Ron

[Vladimir256]

Not so. His hand + the flashlight was not in contact with the pendulum, only
the sprung lever actually makes contact.

Yes, but that lever is being hit with more force then necessary to light the light.

Think of it this way if you wish... the pendulum, on it's down stroke, lifts the
counter weight. Gravity lowers the counter weight on the pendulum's up stroke.

You can extract this resulting force equally on both strokes, or bias it to favor one
or the other stroke.

Does putting more torque on the side opposite the pendulum increase the up or sown stroke.

Also, can a pendulum on a string instead of a bar work just as well?

[brantc]

I dont think I have made any posts in this forum, but I have to for this one. I have been studying gravity, a new model based on the aether. The reason why you get more energy out of this device is because it follows the true motion of a gravity impulse as predicted here.
http://ourworld.compuserve.com/homepages/dp5/aethergrav.htm

Specifically this section,
http://ourworld.compuserve.com/homepages/dp5/aethergrav.htm#g4

This graphic describes the trues shape of a gravity impulse.
http://ourworld.compuserve.com/homepages/dp5/cycloid3.jpg

As you can see no other pendulum design follows this shape except this one.