12 times more output than input, dual mechanical oscillation system !

[bigface]

I still doubt that this machine is overunity.  If this machine is overunity then it would most likely be due to the swinging of the pendulum.  I don't see why the lever is necessary at all, it only makes it lose energy due to friction.  The lever does not contribute any more energy it just transfers it from one end to the other.  why not just have a pendulum on a string pulling on a load? that would make the system more efficient because it doesn't lose energy to friction from the lever. 

[hartiberlin]

@bigface,
you did not understand the principle:

As the pendulum is at its highest point the force onto the leverarm is zero
and thus the other end of the leverarm behind the pivot point  gets more heavy.

When the pendulum is at its lowest point in its swing, it gets much more heavy,
also through its centrifugal force and this will make this leverarm
much more heavy now and it can lift up the other leverarm with much more force.

So you see, the pendulum is modulating the gravity which is working onto the
whole leverarm and thus can convert gravity field energy to mechanical output energy.

As the input power via pushing the pendulum is almost at 90 degrees to the gravity field,
so this does not interact with the gravity and thus it needs only low input power.

The more centrifugal force we have, which is a virtual force,
the higher will be the COP over one..


So it is basically a gravity modulation device with low input power and higher
output power, converting unbalanced gravity forces into real mechanical
output power.
Regards, Stefan.

[ravengo2005]

If you need translation for any of this texts, I can help. I know serbian language. 

[bigface]

hartiberlin, thanks for replying.  I do understand the principle behind this device.  My point was that the lever is pointless.  The driving force behind this device is the pendulum, if this device really did create energy it would be due to the swinging of the pendulum and not the movement of the lever.  The lever merely transfers downward force created by the pendulum into upward force of the other side.  This principle would be just as valid if you used a pulley system instead of a lever. 
              The lever contributes nothing in terms of energy.To suggest that this device is over unity is suggesting a pendulum is overunity.  i do not know whether a pendulum is or isn't but either way the lever does nothing of use in the system.  i think that the easiest way to verify this system is simply attach a pendulum to a spring scale. 
               it would still work the on the exact same principle as the lever/pendulum combo but it would be easier to measure.  The the lowest point of the swing it would have gravitational and centrifugal force pulling down on the spring.  At the highest point you would have essentially no force acting on the spring so it would go back up. So gravity would still be modulated as you say, just using a spring instead of a lever.  This would make it a lot easier to measure then adding an extra piece (lever) into the equation.  instead of having lever+pendulum+scale(to measure output) you can simply have scale+pendulum.
              i hope i made myself clear and i look forward to your response. 

[helmut]

Hi Bigface

Please have a look to the first Movie from the Inventor.
He explains,what happens to the Oscilation and what happend on the other Side of the Lever.
You can not just ignore the part of the Resonanz.

helmut