12 times more output than input, dual mechanical oscillation system !

[supersam]

fe:

a simple piece of leather on the downstroke!

lol
sam

[FreeEnergy]

like to see a picture just to confirm


thanks

[supersam]

fe:

right!

lol
sam

[FreeEnergy]

to all,

while i see alot of people trying to use bicycle's to close the loop of this device, i don't see anyone thinking about where the tourqe is located in this device!  everyone seems to be trying to take maximum torque from the end of the lever, even after it has loaded a spring. 

if you look at the point where, maximum power or, (crush force), is , you will see that it is at the fulcrum of the lever!  not at the end of the lever.  (where would you rather have your finger?)  if you don't want your finger at the end of the lever( under the hammer), you damn sure don't want it any closer to the fulcrum. 

the thing is, that none of the replications, that i have seen, have taken this into cosideration.  please, someone take this into consideration and see what kind of power you can develop from the axel of the fulcrum on the lever.  not to be mistaken for the end of the lever. 

no wonder you can't get any power!

lol
ss

hi all, me again.

just a suggestion. what if you hang the whole device like a pendulum from the lever's fulcrum? i think you will have more torque in the other end of the pendulum.

[hansvonlieven]

G'day all,

The trouble with taking the power off the balance beam's fulcrum is that you don't get enough movement to do anything with, granted there is more torque, but without gearing or levering it, it is quite useless for any practical application.

If on the other hand you take the power off the pendulum's fulcrum the whole idea of secondary oscillations goes out of the window. You will just bring the thing to a standstill so much quicker.

Hans von Lieven