12 times more output than input, dual mechanical oscillation system !

[tagor]

Okay, you manage to spin a wheel with the oscillator, congratulated, but is the energy of the wheel sufficient to keep the pendulum going? Where is the loop in this? Where do you try to feed back that energy? That is what we want to now out here at this overunity forum. is this an overunity thing or not?

okay

I think that "12 times more output than input" is not possible with a pendulum and gravity

[AnandAadhar]

I here by call out to every replicator interested in the two stage oscillation process to examine this video and work on a real device utilizing the very simple processes that I've explained in this video.

     http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FaQ7H0UKF94

I myself will be working on a real one to show off.

In the mean time... here is the original bouncer:

     http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YTLh_vYBpd4

The problem is in creating the loop from the bouncer. Calculations of overunity are all fine as long as the excess energy can run the motor that drives the bouncer. But we haven't seen such a construction as yet. So what can we replicate? Your software offers a design of little practical value in my view.  No engineer will connect the bouncer to a cogwheel as primitive and inefficient as you suggest. The above suggestion of connecting the bouncer to a bicycle wheel gear box seems much better. You ask for replication of your design, but the only real thing to replicate is that bouncer of the realtime vid that for lacking a loop or real time power measurement has not proven to deliver more energy than it takes as yet. You make a nice guess with your software, but offer a replication of the bouncer, that is all. But we don't replicate designs that are replications or copy theories for that matter, we replicate applications that supposedly work. A (software) design is just a theory, the actual proof is in the application. So I'd say, as you promise indeed,  start tinkering yourself with a proper feedback system or a power in/out difference of measurement on that bouncer of yours until you have something real that works and then ask for replication.

[AnandAadhar]

okay

I think that "12 times more output than input" is not possible with a pendulum and gravity

Well I don't think anything because I don't know. People can claim all sorts of things, but you simply have to try until it works as claimed or else conclude that the claim is false. Just thinking so doesn't help at all.

[MoRo]

The problem is in creating the loop from the bouncer. Calculations of overunity are all fine as long as the excess energy can run the motor that drives the bouncer. But we haven't seen such a construction as yet. So what can we replicate? Your software offers a design of little practical value in my view.  No engineer will connect the bouncer to a cogwheel as primitive and inefficient as you suggest. The above suggestion of connecting the bouncer to a bicycle wheel gear box seems much better. You ask for replication of your design, but the only real thing to replicate is that bouncer of the realtime vid that for lacking a loop or real time power measurement has not proven to deliver more energy than it takes as yet. You make a nice guess with your software, but offer a replication of the bouncer, that is all. But we don't replicate designs that are replications or copy theories for that matter, we replicate applications that supposedly work. A (software) design is just a theory, the actual proof is in the application. So I'd say, as you promise indeed,  start tinkering yourself with a proper feedback system or a power in/out difference of measurement on that bouncer of yours until you have something real that works and then ask for replication.

Let me re-frase that then... Don't replicate this system... Be creative! Examine the thing and figure out how to apply the principal to some application, whether its a better way to spin a bicycle wheel or to grind Orio cookies or even to feedback loop the thing so that it explodes. I don't care... Just do something!!!


There is that better. 

P.S.  This topic is about energy in versus energy out, not Feedback loops.

[AnandAadhar]

Let me re-frase that then... Don't replicate this system... Be creative! Examine the thing and figure out how to apply the principal to some application, whether its a better way to spin a bicycle wheel or to grind Orio cookies or even to feedback loop the thing so that it explodes. I don't care... Just do something!!!


There is that better. 

P.S.  This topic is about energy in versus energy out, not Feedback loops.

yah okay I'm on a yearlong project engaging a pendulum my own way. See My IPMM studies. Concrete results I will report here and discuss there.    See http://www.overunity.com/index.php/topic,4449.new.html#top