12 times more output than input, dual mechanical oscillation system !

[MarkE]

The Tsinghua University Energy Multiplier works.  It is prevented from publishing and marketing because of State Secret.

And yet you claim to be releasing this "state secret". The common denominator to your claims is that all we see are excuses as to why there is no proof of these supposed wonders of science.

The Chan Wheel works and I have it in Hong Kong.  It can demonstrate that a balanced wheel will not lift the Weight and the Unbalanced Wheel can easily do so.  The lead-out energy is equal to (m1-m2)gh in case of the pendulum.

By works do you mean that the wheel can execute as many cycles as we might wish to observe each time delivering energy to an external load without the aid of an externally applied energy source?  Or do you mean something trite and silly such as the device moves once and without additional external energy stops?

The Centrifugal Force must be added to the weight of the pendulum bob to provide the tension in the string.  This had not been taken into account in the past.
Please show your mathematics of the pendulum in the case of the Milkovic 2SO.

Over 50 QMOGENs have claimed to have successfully self-looped including Chas Campbell.  It is the Governments (USA and China included) putting their influence to prevent "a paradigm shift" that may affect the National Interest.

Thousands of Nigerian "princes" claim to have security cases in London and Amsterdam just waiting for some "trustworthy" partner to claim them.  No "QMOGEN" has ever been demonstrated to actually produce surplus energy.

[/b]I believe Lee Cheung Kin is right.  Governments have applied the technology in the Military applications.  They are far ahead compared with what we are presenting here today.

Spend US$100 or so.  Buy an old bicycle wheel and a lead weight.  Build a Frame and lever system similar to the Chan Wheel.  Prove to yourself that both the Milkovic 2SO and Chan Wheel are lead-out energy devices.

You said that $100,000 for the purchase of a WITTS QEG was no problem.  Why haven't you spent the $100. you say is all that is needed to prove these devices are all that you claim? 

[noonespecial]

A centrifugal force poses no load to the system, hence it cannot be considered to be a contributor to do work.


Vidar

What's doing the work in this video? What's turning the flywheel? Would rotating a balanced weight with the drill motor do the same thing?

Lawrence is correct but there are limitations to this theory.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jk7HuJgA0jY

[Low-Q]

I thought that this is questioned, and is thought to be a basis for OU. (EVGRAY yahoo group etc).

It's ok to question, but nature will probably not change for that reason.

Vidar.

[MarkE]

What's doing the work in this video? What's turning the flywheel? Would rotating a balanced weight with the drill motor do the same thing?

Lawrence is correct but there are limitations to this theory.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jk7HuJgA0jY

Force that is normal to the direction of motion exchanges no work.

[noonespecial]

Force that is normal to the direction of motion exchanges no work.

So basically, a lever does no work?