12 times more output than input, dual mechanical oscillation system !

[ayeaye]

Pirate88179, your neighbor needs you. Who would need your work without him, who were you without him. All is common good. The only difference, you don't want the good to be so common.

[ltseung888]

From a Chinese Korean War Commander: "Courage and human flesh are not material in any war."

China must have equal or superior weapons.  Lead-out Energy Flying Saucers are obvious superior weapons.  No wonder they are top secret.

But in the Modern World, Wars are not fought in trenches.  They are fought in the Board Rooms and on the Internet...

The weapons are technology, economics and new paradigm.

[MarkE]

There are many voices out there selling the idea to the middle class that their well being is being siphoned away by meager benefits to the weakest and most vulnerable in society.  The middle class are being systemically hosed not by the poor but by the wealthiest in our society.  The decimation of capital gains and estate taxes have led to the rich becoming super rich and their idle children get to keep that largesse.  The difference between a dilletante and a homeless person is in daddy's bank account.  The big welfare programs in the US support the big banks (fed discount window lends at a quarter point and the government borrows back at 3.25%) and a completely overblown military industrial complex.  More than $1 trillion per year go down those two rat holes.  Suppose we were to cut that in half.  Think of the economic activity we could generate with half a trillion per year. 

[Farmhand]

But Mark, for a country with a huge debt that also runs a deficit every year halving a portion of the "loaned money" should only mean loaning less money, not loaning the same amount of money and staying in debt. If by some miracle the country manages to run a profit for the year the entire profit amount should go towards paying the debt down. After all that would be a good example to set rather than the example the elected officials set now and in the past.

Don't spend what you don't have and definitely do not borrow money on behalf of others that no one can pay back. Our government borrowed some 40 billion dollars and just handed it all out to the population during the GFC to stimulate the economy, it wasn't needed and did more harm than good because now we must pay it back with interest. Which no country should have to do. It's all a contrived mess. The messier it gets the harder it is to sort out and hold anyone responsible. The government of the day has no right to borrow money from some entity on my behalf then force the money on me. So the way I see it the debt is not mine. I don't pay tax anymore because I'm a pensioner, a real one with a crippling disability. Most likely I'll never work again. And when I look at the dysfunction in the way all government operates and the apathetic view of most workers towards any real solution, I think people are their own worst enemy and most lack the guts to do anything to help to prevent the situation becoming so bad our children's children will be born with debt they have no chance of ever paying back. 

If all the debt in the world is added up there is not enough real money to cover it. The debt is already unpayable. Seems like. I see no way that spending can increase or stay the same without the balance becoming greater.

This is the number 1 problem facing humanity, not free energy. Maybe it is close to the time for cleaning house, I'll jump into big bottomless pit if I can take all the Rothschilds and Rockefellers with me.

That's my offer. 

..

[MarkE]

But Mark, for a country with a huge debt that also runs a deficit every year halving a portion of the "loaned money" should only mean loaning less money, not loaning the same amount of money and staying in debt. If by some miracle the country manages to run a profit for the year the entire profit amount should go towards paying the debt down. After all that would be a good example to set rather than the example the elected officials set now and in the past.

Don't spend what you don't have and definitely do not borrow money on behalf of others that no one can pay back. Our government borrowed some 40 billion dollars and just handed it all out to the population during the GFC to stimulate the economy, it wasn't needed and did more harm than good because now we must pay it back with interest. Which no country should have to do. It's all a contrived mess. The messier it gets the harder it is to sort out and hold anyone responsible. The government of the day has no right to borrow money from some entity on my behalf then force the money on me. So the way I see it the debt is not mine. I don't pay tax anymore because I'm a pensioner, a real one with a crippling disability. Most likely I'll never work again. And when I look at the dysfunction in the way all government operates and the apathetic view of most workers towards any real solution, I think people are their own worst enemy and most lack the guts to do anything to help to prevent the situation becoming so bad our children's children will be born with debt they have no chance of ever paying back. 

If all the debt in the world is added up there is not enough real money to cover it. The debt is already unpayable. Seems like. I see no way that spending can increase or stay the same without the balance becoming greater.

This is the number 1 problem facing humanity, not free energy. Maybe it is close to the time for cleaning house, I'll jump into big bottomless pit if I can take all the Rothschilds and Rockefellers with me.

That's my offer. 

..

For a government that collects taxes, they can increase revenue by increasing economic activity.  Economic activity has a multiplier effect.  People at the bottom spend all that they get and so the multiplier is very high.  People at the top hold onto a large proportion of the money they get and the multiplier effect is much lower.  Look at what has happened to government debt since the days of Reagan and Thatcher when these policies of unburdening the very wealthy went into effect:  Huge wealth gains at the top, and huge government deficits.  The very wealthy at the top want everyone to believe the myth that this is the result of assisting the weakest and most vulnerable in society.  They tell us that the way to run down the very government debt that is making a number of them much wealthier is to give the wealthiest an even greater proportion of economic production.

You are right that governments cannot hand out more than they take in indefinitely.  What many people do not see is that the really big hand-outs are to the super rich and their children.  The children of the super rich do not contribute anymore to economic production than anyone else who does not work.  They live off the huge government give away to their parents.