12 times more output than input, dual mechanical oscillation system !

[ltseung888]

Looks like we can break the design into many parts.

1.  What is the best material and construction for the donut or circular track?
2.  What kind of cart to place the magnets?
3.  What kind of magnets?
4.  What is the best Pulse Control mechanism?
5.  What is the best DC Power supply circuit and mechanism?
6.  What is the best energy extraction coil and circuit?
7.  What are the best control mechanisms?
8.  What is the best energy lead-out mechanism?

These questions should be passed to top engineering teams.  The theory and the formula are clearly laid down.  The theoretical foundation is solid.  The device can be built into standard "thrusters".

This forum is one of the places to share information.  However, some may see the commercial value and may want to keep their research confidential.  (Some military establishments may be forbidden to disclose any information.)

The lead-out energy Flying Saucer is no long a possibility.  It is a certainty.  The new paradigm will be here.  Enjoy the Divine Wine...

Lawrence
reply 3156

[Pirate88179]

RE:  The Donut Shaped Flying Saucer.

Here is another version...with sprinkles, which may add to inflight stability under high G forces.

Bill

[ltseung888]

Lawrence,,

Look at the pic of Franken Motor,, you see it is a donut,, aka round shape.

I used a single coil for a bunch of tests,, those included a single pulse of varying duration relative to coil length to see about spin down stuff,, all sorts of things I tested and was looking for.

What it is that YOU are saying is there is NOT there the way YOU are thinking it is.

What is making the magnet "TURN" into and away from your coils??  What is that force doing and where is it making things want to move to,, and why is it rotating the direction of that force??

Let us examine the operation of the fifth design of the Flying Saucer.

1.   Let us start from rest.  The permanent magnet (PM) is at the bottom with the S pole nearer the LHS.  The Energy giving Pulse Coil is turned on.  The Coil will have N pole facing the S pole of the PM.  The magnetic force of attraction will move the PM in the anti-clockwise direction.
2.   The PM will accelerate (gain in velocity) as the force of attraction gets stronger.
3.   The DC current supply to the Coil is switched off as soon as the PM reaches the middle of the Coil.  This step is essential.  If not, the PM will be attracted back.
4.   The PM will continue the high velocity during the top side of the circle.  This will give a high Centrifugal Force.
5.   The Pulse should be strong enough to move the PM a few rotations (with the energy take-out coil open and no additional pulse).  This will test the set up so that frictional and other losses will not affect the operation.
6.   The Pulse Circuit can then be turned on and off.  The PM should keep increasing in velocity.  A high RMP can be achieved.  A laser detection mechanism is recommended.
7.   The Energy take-out circuit can now be started.  This will take-out some energy and the PM moves slower on the bottom half of the donut.  The velocity, however, should be strong enough for the operation to continue,
8.   By adjusting the resistance of the take-out coil, we should be able to achieve steady state – the velocity at the top is higher than that of the bottom with a consistent value.
9.   We can then measure the net Centrifugal Force.
Hope the above description is clear enough.

Lawrence
Reply 3156

[Low-Q]

Let us examine the operation of the fifth design of the Flying Saucer.

1.   Let us start from rest. AND LEAVE IT THAT WAY.

The only sentence that is true is the first one. The rest is just whishful thinking.


Vidar

[ltseung888]

and the coil will also want to move in the other direction.
...

When we play with circular motion, we always need to consider counter-rotating pairs.   The pairs can be jointed in many ways - on top or side-by-side.  They may not even be matching.

Only the PM is rotating after proper set up.  The resulting thrust is upwards in the diagram.

Lawrence
reply 3156