Pierre's 170W in 1600W out Looped Very impressive Build continued & moderated

[r2fpl]

Pierre,

Share your hard work with everyone. Explain how your generator works.
You will register in history and no one will be in front of you. Do not keep it secret!
There is too much evil that makes people slaves like energy.
Do not try to wait and improve something that is already there. It's a waste of life.
Just give it to people.

If you give us the recipe everyone will sign this DZ GENERATOR by PIERRE!

I think that not only I have this request.

[stargate22]

Pierre,

Share your hard work with everyone. Explain how your generator works.
You will register in history and no one will be in front of you. Do not keep it secret!
There is too much evil that makes people slaves like energy.
Do not try to wait and improve something that is already there. It's a waste of life.
Just give it to people.

If you give us the recipe everyone will sign this DZ GENERATOR by PIERRE!
I think that not only I have this request.

Amen....

[dole]

I just got inspiration (sorry for that, hate writing)

Agree, I can try to challenge him (IMHO, just in case)

Let say, we wind a coil like we thinks. Indeed, we calculate how many turns we need for input voltage and current
and how many we must have for output.
Than we start like everyone knows, 1 to 6 and 2 to 7 ... 6-12 and then we stop and think. What we have done.
We were carefully thinking 6 and simultaneously thinking around to the end.
We realized where the strong are and where next one comes.
Then we find repetition pattern and winding a rest just enough to suit out calculation.

Bingo.

So far so good, but it appears that we need more turns for output, strange?
So we think again and find that 2+2+2 are equal 6. 2 is not a good number for strong one, why?
Because we split 50/50 and spread what we actuality wish to separate as best as possible.
So suddenly we see 9 
Apparently 3+3+3 are equal 9, ... wow this is good arrangement, 3 as a strong one. Why?
Let say 100 (We think X^2) and in correct geometry it end up with 9+81+9 instead 50+50.

Pierre you mentioned 4 poles did you tried? (Of course 6 between  )

We can go further,

We are for now only in 2D, we accomplish that and now we start thinking 3D.
Mowing in X-Y plane and thinking same in Z and then we realize something much bigger...... to be continued 

Come on Pierre... " We know that you know that we know"

d.

[pedro1]

Je sais que vous avez tous hâte d'avoir les détail du dz générateur mais pour l'instant j'aime mieux mettre mes efforts sur un deuxième prototype que passer mes soirée a répondre au question  cela n'est pas trop productif quand ce seras fait il me feras plaisir de tout vous expliquer en détail mais en attendant je continue à suivre vos idée et vos commentaire durant mes pause au travail et j'espère vous en mettre plein la vue avec la deuxième version du dz générateur mais je peut vous dite que cela prendras plusieurs mois a faire car il y a beaucoup de travail  avant que ce ne soit fonctionnel merci a tous de votre compréhension .            Pierre cotnoir

En. I know you're all looking forward to the details of the dz generator but for now I prefer to put my efforts in building the second prototype than to spend my evening answering questions, that wouldn't be productive. When I have it done I'll be happy to explain everything in detail but in the meantime I'll continue to follow your ideas and comments during my breaks at work and I hope you will be amazed with the second version of the dz generator but I can tell you it will take several months to complete because there's a lot of work to be done before it's functional.
Thank you all for your understanding. 
Pierre Cotnoir

[e2matrix]

Good to hear from you Pierre.   Best of luck on the 2nd prototype.