Kapanadze and other FE discussion

[pix]

Sorry to interrupt
Much easier to offer a test ( no charge) to Bunk
Especially since he is so close to Lab and also some members for testing.


This type testing has been offered here many many times over the years !
Will help Bunk get tech out to the world!


One and done...
Respectfully
Chet K
Please reach out for Stefan ( Hartiberlin ) did send Stefan a heads up note


Or not ??..his choice
EDIT for comment below ( since removed)
Offer stands for Bunk ,perhaps one of his customers would like lab grade test no charge?( prior to purchase?)

Spare me.
It looks ridiculous begging a con man .

[r2fpl]

...
Kapa Banka - 28th April 2004
...

Sergh thanks for this information.

I have long believed that a current amplifier or something that gives energy is something that is in a vacuum.
A long time ago, someone from Kapanadze's friends wrote that he ordered a glass thing like a glass bubble and paid about $ 400.
Comparing the devices, each weighs over 5 kg, but there is one that is about 2 kg. It's a 2kW board in the room. Surely you have seen this device. There are plastic boxes and it's hard to bear something big and heavy like a transformer. Someone in the video picks up this device and you can see that it is very light. They say it weighs about 2 kg.
ok. There may of course be an HF transformer because my 2kW induction cooker weighs 0.5 kg. It has an operating frequency of 147kHz if you can compare it that way.
However, I lacked proof that the Kapanadze device works in a vacuum! If what has been translated is true, then to my knowledge it will be a special cold cathode vacuum tube. The effect obtained is the dynatron effect, but no one has achieved amplification in the traditional way. This effect is neutralized normally because it harms the electron tube. Manufacturers specifically suppress it as much as they can.

This dynatron effect is free energy for us, but the construction of a mass-produced lamp does not allow to strengthen this effect because the electrons that are knocked out of the cathode weaken when they reach the anode. If the conditions are right, 1 electron will duplicate itself into several more, but their energy will be xN electrons. The problem is that when they break away from the cathode, their energy will decrease. However, there is a design of a vacuum tube that is built to multiply electrons. It is not an electron multiplier! It's a completely different lamp. The design is rather at home such lamps.

It's very possible that the vacuum tube is under the coils in 2004 inside because a magnetic field is needed to keep the electrons away from the anode or the effect will be killed.

I think Kapanadze can use a vaccume tube where electrons multiply.

[rakarskiy]

There are two types of electromagnetic induction (contact induction and focal induction). There is another type that few people look at, electrostatic induction on the conductor. If CAPAGEN worked, the probability that he tamed the third type of induction in the converter is quite likely. After completing my projects I will deal with just this variant, although I am not sure what exactly in the way it is presented in the device CAPAGEN. Everyone have a good search and experiments!

[r2fpl]

There are two types of electromagnetic induction (contact induction and focal induction). There is another type that few people look at, electrostatic induction on the conductor. If CAPAGEN worked, the probability that he tamed the third type of induction in the converter is quite likely. After completing my projects I will deal with just this variant, although I am not sure what exactly in the way it is presented in the device CAPAGEN. Everyone have a good search and experiments!

See this: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kbHDHiAQrrs

Electrostatic induction has the LENZ effect all the time.

I've done some experiments with this and unfortunately there's always LENZ. In the case of the vacuum tube and the dynatron effect, there is no problem because the effect is to multiply the energy which makes more sense than toying with the energy you have, for example, in a transformer. Everyone thinks that if they arrange the cables in a strange way, it will make more energy. There are powerful transformers for thousands of kVa and no excess energy was found there. At most, surges when a solar storm hits transmission lines.

The cold cathode vacuum tube and dynatron effect has a lot of features for free energy. Even the design of the power supply of such a lamp is almost the same as in the Kapanadze patent. This is very strange. Not many people saw it the way I did.

Making such a lamp is very difficult for a beginner, but easy for people who do it professionally.

I just see how many people want to have electricity from winding coils and they get nothing. Doesn't that make you think! that the coils are only a fragment we need but do not give what we call free energy.

[rakarskiy]

See this: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kbHDHiAQrrs

r2fpl
Thanks for the link, I'm glad for the guy that he has an opinion. I'll check my version. By the way, Lenz's law in the original source, defines the direction of the inverse force which generates EMF.   If the current in the conductor is opposite to the direction of the EMF, then how can the magnetic induction of the conductor (its lines of force) be opposite to the direction of the external magnetic lines which produced the EMF? The lines of force of the external flux on one side of the conductor repel the other side attract. The direction of the Ampere force is exactly the same where these lines of force are attracted.  So the modern interpretation of Lenz is a game of cat-and-mouse system.

As soon as there is a current in a conductor with EMF, Lenz's rule will be satisfied.