IS THIS A REACTIONLESS DRIVE OR A PERPETUAL MOTION MACHINE?

[George1]

Deep silence again? Still no objections? This is because it is impossible to deny experimental facts.

[George1]

1) Still no objections against our zigzag mechanical concept? You simply fear the truth thus stopping the technology progress. And because of this we are increasing now the price of our electric technology, which is able to increase twice (as a minimum) the distance traveled by a standard electric vehicle on a single charge. The price of this electric technology is now 30 (thirty) million dollars. And this price will further increase if our zigzag mechanical concept (i.e. the reactionless drive) does not win public recognition.
2) We shared openly and freely two inventions of ours and these are (1) the reactionless drive, considered in this topic, and (2) the electric heater, described in the topic A SIMPLE ELECTRIC HEATER, WHICH HAS EFFICIENCY GREATER THAN 1. And still these two inventions cannot win public recognition. That is why our next several inventions will not be free.   

[sm0ky2]

George, have you constructed a zig-zag device to show us?

[George1]

Hi SmOky2,
Thank you for your last post.
Yes, we have constructed an experimental zig-zag device for the third link https://mypicxbg.files.wordpress.com/2019/07/please_have_a_look.pdf.
But there are two obstacles for showing it and these two obstacles are as follows.
1) Obstacle 1: It would take too much time (especially time!), money and human resources in order to make a high quality professional video. But this obstacle is, let's say, avoidable more or less.
2) Obstacle 2: A member of our team, who is a top expert in tribology (as well as in other technology areas, but tribology is his favorite branch of science), has invented an entirely new and an extremely effective, simple and cheap method for strong reducing of sliding friction. This method is used in the zig-zag device and if we show the zig-zag device, then we will show the new method of decreasing of sliding friction too. Our inventor however does not want to show publicly his sliding-friction-reducing method for the present. We have to obey his decision. But I promise to do my best to persuade our sliding-friction-reducing method inventor to change his mind in the nearest future. Please give me some time.
---------------------------
Meanwhile you could do by yourself the zig-zag experiment in the third link https://mypicxbg.files.wordpress.com/2019/07/please_have_a_look.pdf even on your garage floor. The experiment is extremely simple and cheap. You can use even ordinary lubricants and you only have to add some correction coefficient related to the experimental error due to friction. Besides if you manage to reduce friction enough, then the experimental error due to friction can be neglected.
---------------------------
And at last a simple elementary logic unambiguously shows that we can always choose a suitable combination of (a) magnitude of force of friction, (b) length of segments s and (c) number and shape of zigzags, for which Fc = F'c, Fc > 0, F'c > 0, d = d', d > 0 and d' > 0. Simple logic and simple math. Like 1+1=2. Practically no need of experiment.
---------------------------
Looking forward to your answer.
George

[George1]

Here is again an abstract from our post from May 16, 2019, 09:35:12 AM. "It is evident that we can always choose a suitable combination of (a) magnitude of force of friction, (b) length of segments s and (c) number and shape of zigzags, for which Fc = F'c, Fc > 0, F'c > 0, d = d', d > 0 and d' > 0."
-----------------------------------
Do you have any theoretical (ONLY THEORETICAL!) objections against this last claim?     
Looking forward to your answer.
Regards,
George