IS THIS A REACTIONLESS DRIVE OR A PERPETUAL MOTION MACHINE?

[George1]

A copy of our last post in besslerwheel.com/forum. The copy is surrounded/limited up and down by double dashed lines. The same topic and the same title.
=========================
To ME.
----------------------------------
Hi ME,
1) Negligible friction. Weightlessness conditions.
2) Two bodies.
3) Two centers of mass.
4) Two ends of a spring.
5) Two forces, (a) which cause the motion of bodies 1 and 2, (b) which are opposite in direction and equal in magnitude, (c) which have a common line of action (this is the straight line "a") and (d) which are applied to the two centers of mass, respectively.
6) Two identical dynamometers, which are attached to the two ends of the spring (to the two centers of mass), respectively.
----------------------------
Question: What would be the readings of the two identical dynamometers (a) while the spring contracts and (b) while covering (SOLELY AND ONLY!!!!) distance "k" bodies 1 and 2 slide (without losing contact) relative one to other?
----------------------------
Answer: The readings of the two identical dynamometers would be absolutely identical (as this fact does not depend on sizes, masses and inertia moments of bodies 1 and 2).
----------------------------
As if even without any animation everything seems to be clear enough from Figs. 1A, 1B, 2A and 2B and from the related texts. (It's better to have an animation, of course.)
-----------------------------
Looking forward to your answer.

[George1]

Any comments/questions?

[George1]

Please follow our discussion in besslerwheel.com/forum. The same topic and the same title.

[George1]

Please follow our discussion in besslerwheel.com/forum. The same topic and the same title. There are two obvious and most active agents of the official science mafia there. These are ME and Tarsier79. I am shocked by their desperate efforts to reject obvious truths. Terrific! 

[George1]

ME and Tarsier79 from besslerwheel.com/forum are extremely stubborn manipulators. These two obviously get good money in order to cheat and manipulate the audience. As a counter-attack here is our last post there. (This last post is given below the double dashed line.)
===============================================
1) It is a real obvious fact that each of the two identical dynamometers would register one and same force G in Figs. 1A, 1B, 2A and 2B.
2) The validity of the above item 1 directly leads to the validity of steps 1, 2, 3, 4 and 4a, published in some previous posts of ours.
3) The validity of the above item 2 directly leads to the validity of our first post of . The zigzags generate mechanical resistance, (a) which is absolutely identical to friction and (b) which does not generate heat. The final result is a mechanical OU device combined with a reactionless drive. Simple, clear and understandable.
----------------------------------------------------
How many years are necessary for a simple obvious truth to win public recognition? 10 years? 100 years? 1000 years? As if human race is on its road to perdition.