IS THIS A REACTIONLESS DRIVE OR A PERPETUAL MOTION MACHINE?

[George1]

Our computer simulation and animation of the zigzag concept is under construction. It will take some time. Please be patient.

[George1]

We keep working on our computer simulation and animation of the zigzag concept. It will take some time.

[George1]

Our zigzag concept simulation/animation is under costruction.

[George1]

We are preparing now our zigzag concept simulation/animation. It will take some time.

[nix85]

I am disclosing here a simplest to build inertial drive.

It's just a double pendulum that oscillates within ~90°.

Oscillation is limited with springs on the side walls.

If there was just one pendulum, whole frame would of course be pushed in the opposite direction but since there are two pendulums going in opposite directions against same frame, frame remains in place.

What is left is pure linear pull due to asymmetrical centrifugal force.

This is an example of free energy cause we are using reactive power (compression and decompression of the spring/band) to do real work (linear acceleration).

Another way to do this is to accelerate and decelerate pendulums at the axis, like so https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eeZXNo4EII0

But this is more complicated. Springs are the simplest way to demonstrate the principle.

This device, if you use good springs that can store enough energy can easily lift whole device against gravity.

See a mouse trap lift itself, watch with 0.25x speed,

https://youtu.be/VZqwvGhoHKU?t=219