IS THIS A REACTIONLESS DRIVE OR A PERPETUAL MOTION MACHINE?

[George1]

To Low-Q/Vidar
---------------------------
Hi Vidar,
You greatly disappoint me, my friend!
You have written: "The only force that somewhat imitate friction is a constant acceleration of mass, but then you gain kinetic energy as the velocity increase.
The "friction" you talk about does not involve any increase of kinetic energy due to mass acceleration, so therefor the friction must cause heat. So, to answer your last question, the zigzags generate heat if you cannot recover 100% of the "friction" to do useful work." There is no sense in this composition of words. This is for example something like the following sentence: " The Moon is black and it walks around the green tree." Grammatically correct, but absurd.
George

[George1]

To Low-Q/Vidar
---------------------------
Hi Vidar,
You greatly disappoint me, my friend!
You have written: "The only force that somewhat imitate friction is a constant acceleration of mass, but then you gain kinetic energy as the velocity increase. The "friction" you talk about does not involve any increase of kinetic energy due to mass acceleration, so therefor the friction must cause heat. So, to answer your last question, the zigzags generate heat if you cannot recover 100% of the "friction" to do useful work." There is no sense in this composition of words. This is for example something like the following sentence: " The Moon is black and it walks around the green tree." Grammatically correct, but absurd.
George

[George1]

I don't know why my last post has been sent two times in a row. I am not responsible for this.

[Low-Q]

To Low-Q/Vidar
---------------------------
Hi Vidar,
You greatly disappoint me, my friend!
You have written: "The only force that somewhat imitate friction is a constant acceleration of mass, but then you gain kinetic energy as the velocity increase. The "friction" you talk about does not involve any increase of kinetic energy due to mass acceleration, so therefor the friction must cause heat. So, to answer your last question, the zigzags generate heat if you cannot recover 100% of the "friction" to do useful work." There is no sense in this composition of words. This is for example something like the following sentence: " The Moon is black and it walks around the green tree." Grammatically correct, but absurd.
George

Sorry for disapointing you. I hope you can provide an understandable explanation to why the zig-zag does not loose energy to heat, and why friction, per definition, doesn't create heat.
My purpose was not to disappoint you, but putting down my thoughts on the subject.
Mechanical systems follows mechanical physics. There is no workaround to avoid a physical device to violate its physical nature.


Vidar

[George1]

Vidar,
1) But you haven't read at all the two posts of July 21, 2018, 02:11:37 PM and May 16, 2019, 09:35:12 AM. PLEASE READ THEM CAREFULLY!
2) Here is an abstract from our post from May 16, 2019, 09:35:12 AM. "It is evident that we can always choose a suitable combination of (a) magnitude of force of friction, (b) length of segments s and (c) number and shape of zigzags, for which Fc = F'c, Fc > 0, F'c > 0, d = d', d > 0 and d' > 0." Any objections against this last claim?
George