I need all Erfinder posts?

[TinselKoala]

I have no sympathy but reading your post I certainly understand your frustration especially after watching the "Flame 2.0" (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HqWdxVNnhDc).

- Not being able to understand anything said in the first 30 seconds of the clip...
- Then in the following 5 minutes, demonstrated power in open circuit that you have no clue how to explain to cohorts of admirers...

Now your paycheck might stop coming too...

Boy, it must hurt.

Are you talking to me? My paycheck stopped coming a long time ago.

I love that particular video because it illustrates just why I said "good riddance". Note that he has Comments Disabled. He is not interested in real discussion.

[barbosi]

Are you talking to me? My paycheck stopped coming a long time ago.

I love that particular video because it illustrates just why I said "good riddance". Note that he has Comments Disabled. He is not interested in real discussion.

EF volleyed the ball in several occasions, as an invitation for those who can think for themselves. Very few picked up on the topics. You were not amongst them. Nobody excluded you from a "real discussion".


After years of demoting ideas on this forum in the name of "True Science", you (TK) forgot to inform your followers about many fallacies circulating amongst them.
- One reason might be that you are not as competent as you pose.
- Another is that you have a vested interest in keeping people in ignorance.
One example: the proper name of "Joule thief oscillator" is "blocking oscillator" and the concept is old as the vacuum tubes not a free energy community invention. That clever omission – among others – proves that your real interest is not in informing and guiding people, but rather in snitching (hence my statement about your paycheck).


So in my opinion, EF wanted "real discussions" just not with everyone, especially with people like you (TK).
When the fox preaches, look to your geese.
But that is just my opinion and it has little or no consequence after he left the building.

[web000x]

EF volleyed the ball in several occasions, as an invitation for those who can think for themselves. Very few picked up on the topics. You were not amongst them. Nobody excluded you from a "real discussion".


After years of demoting ideas on this forum in the name of "True Science", you (TK) forgot to inform your followers about many fallacies circulating amongst them.
- One reason might be that you are not as competent as you pose.
- Another is that you have a vested interest in keeping people in ignorance.
One example: the proper name of "Joule thief oscillator" is "blocking oscillator" and the concept is old as the vacuum tubes not a free energy community invention. That clever omission – among others – proves that your real interest is not in informing and guiding people, but rather in snitching (hence my statement about your paycheck).


So in my opinion, EF wanted "real discussions" just not with everyone, especially with people like you (TK).
When the fox preaches, look to your geese.
But that is just my opinion and it has little or no consequence after he left the building.

My discussions with Erfinder ignited an inferno under my ass.  Nobody else has done that for me with regards to my research.  Because I will find what I seek, I will be truly indebted in the coming days and will appreciate that I was left to my own devices, not given plans.  Learning to fish today.  The water is becoming clearer. 


Dave

[TinselKoala]

EF volleyed the ball in several occasions, as an invitation for those who can think for themselves. Very few picked up on the topics. You were not amongst them. Nobody excluded you from a "real discussion".


After years of demoting ideas on this forum in the name of "True Science", you (TK) forgot to inform your followers about many fallacies circulating amongst them.
- One reason might be that you are not as competent as you pose.

I invite anyone to compare my videos with those of Erfinder. From whom do you learn more? Who presents better? Who tries the hardest to debunk fallacies and to educate others without misleading them?

- Another is that you have a vested interest in keeping people in ignorance.
One example: the proper name of "Joule thief oscillator" is "blocking oscillator" and the concept is old as the vacuum tubes not a free energy community invention. That clever omission – among others – proves that your real interest is not in informing and guiding people, but rather in snitching (hence my statement about your paycheck).

Now you are just being silly, or maybe lying on purpose.  Do you really think that I've kept secret the fact that our JT circuits are blocking oscillators? Maybe you should do a little more research.

Snitching? I laugh out loud at your "snitching". You cannot possibly justify that accusation with any facts... because there is no justification for it. Maybe you don't know what "snitching" actually means in English.

Keeping people in ignorance? Here you are showing your own ignorance and bias. There are a handful of people posting here that are truly educational. You, and your Erfinder hero, are not among them. I hope that I am, and I have a bunch of video evidence of my efforts to educate people like you, and yes... Erfinder. Where's your evidence? You don't have any.

So in my opinion, EF wanted "real discussions" just not with everyone, especially with people like you (TK).

"People like me" with some skill and knowledge of the subject matter... like notably Tin Man and some others. I'm proud to be included in that group. Erfinder excluded himself voluntarily, because of that huge chip on his shoulder.

When the fox preaches, look to your geese.
But that is just my opinion and it has little or no consequence after he left the building.

That's your opinion all right, but the facts refute you. You can lead a horse to water but you can't make him drink. Or, in your case... think.

[barbosi]

I invite anyone to compare my videos with those of Erfinder. From whom do you learn more? Who presents better? Who tries the hardest to debunk fallacies and to educate others without misleading them?
...
There are a handful of people posting here that are truly educational.
...
"People like me" with some skill and knowledge of the subject matter... like notably Tin Man and some others. I'm proud to be included in that group.
...

I'm looking forward to you and the team for the Nobel price news.
As a promise, that day I will buy a hat with propellers matching your skills.