The book is dedicated to self-propelled mechanical generating devices.

[Floor]

@ Mr.Rakarskiy

I don't understand why you have not put together a book of real and
honest information, designs and devices, which can be useful to
people who would like to live "off the grid" ?

You might enjoy that kind of project, and such a book might
sell really well ?

https://losttechnology.org/the-trompe-a-basic-overview/
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pelton_wheel
https://www.instructables.com/Hydraulic-Ram-Pump/
https://homesteading.com/diy-wind-turbine-generators-living-off-the-grid/
https://i.ytimg.com/vi/Xt4dLsqX_I4/maxresdefault.jpg
   AND SO ON

[rakarskiy]

Floor, good time to you!

Unfortunately, the self-contained hydrogenerator system was my mistake. Transition diffuser - confuser for liquid, does not work to increase pressure. The calculations of the system itself and the attachments are correct, they work according to the classics. To build such a system, it is necessary to increase the static pressure in front of the nozzle. Perhaps this can be done using a device such as a hydraulic accumulator. This is not my question of hydrostatics and hydraulics. Got good science. Within the framework of the project, an electromechanical generator was tested, with a lower electromagnetic moment compared to traditional ones. This is what I am doing. In addition, a FLYWHEEL instead of a light rotor, for the overrun system is a better and simpler solution than all these "hydrodancers".

In the generator, the electromagnetic torque acts against rotation and is therefore braking in relation to the prime mover. The torque generated by the prime mover balances the electromagnetic torque of the generator and the torque corresponding to the mechanical and magnetic losses in the generator.

Let's say we have a single-phase generator, axial type without cores, the stator coils are filled with polymer resin. Parameters voltage 27V, power 1.47 kW, rotation speed 600 rpm, diameter of the centerline of the coils 0.39 m.
We can calculate its electromagnetic moment: T = 9550*W/rpm  =  9550 * 1,47kW / 600 rpm = 23 Nm

If we check by other formulas: based on the Ampere Force and the Electromagnetic Force of the coils, we get the following parameters:
T = F1(ampere force) + F2(electromagnetic force)) * R (radius), we get   T = (F1+F2)*R = T = (16 + 103)* 0,195 = 23,2 Nm

We see that the calculations are the same. If the ampere force does not go anywhere when interacting with the magnetic flux of the pole, then the electromagnetic force of the coils can be neutralized. Let's reduce it to the value of the ampere force in the coil wire harness:

T = (16 + 16) * 0.195 = 6.24 Nm, At the same time, the total power of the generator remains the same 1.47 kW 

Purely theoretically, it remains to calculate the power of the drive motor to overcome the obtained electromagnetic moment of the generator:
W = T * rpm * 1.2 / 9550 = 6.24 * 600 * 1.2 / 9500 = 0.47 kW

In my book, I discuss several options for creating such power generating machines. The app includes a calculator in Excel for calculating yourself. The inertia of the mass makes it possible to reduce the cost of creating the torque of the drive motor for the generator to a minimum to a minimum.
The question remains, why do we need all these creators of the torque of drive motors on bubbles, jets of liquid, elevation changes, sunlight, etc.

The book is in Russian and I do not plan to translate it into other languages at the moment.

[kolbacict]

The second rotor is repelled from the first, already rotating rotor with, say, half the speed.
is repelled by electromagnetic forces. We transfer energy for it with conductive rings and brushes.
What increment in the kinetic energy of rotation will the system (second rotor) receive for a motionless, resting observer?

[Floor]

Thank you Rakarskiy

Although I do not know if this observation will be of any use to you,  it is practically
all I have to offer.

In the experiments using permanent magnets which I have almost exclusively
confined my studies to during the last several years,  I find more and more evidence
that interactions at 90 degrees are essential to any successful outcome. 

Your theory and / or approach is interesting I intend to spend a little more time to think
about it and hope it will be a fruitful direction of exploration for you.

  floor

[rakarskiy]

floor, Thank you! This is the classic induction emf for a wire relative to the magnetic induction vector. The maximum value is only when the magnetic induction vector and the wire are at an angle of 90 degrees to each other. But there are still many things that are still inaccessible, these are the mechanics of controlling a vortex electric field. So far, no one has managed to visualize this process in dynamics.

The guy was almost there, but did the wrong thing by optimizing his generator.
https://youtu.be/Az0v79-vG_E  (failed on his channel, he has a lot of videos)

The details of my analysis are here:
https://rakatskiy.blogspot.com/2021/03/live-overunity-proof-free-energy.html


Its design matches the principle of this setup: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KgfZy6KllcE&t=27s 
"Earth engine" from the Energy Inductance Company from the USA still the same principle