Time-Tunnels using Self-Powered-Overunity-Devices

[ayeaye]

By thinking in this way, you are denying electromagnetism, which is totally compatible with relativity. Space-time, our 4D universe, is such a powerful concept that we don't even need electromagnetism theory. The way in which relativity can recover all the effects of electromagnetism, from Coulomb's law and from the relativistic effects of charges moving relative to each others proves, beyond any doubt, its power and relevance.

You mess up things pretty well.

Relativity is an important concept, i completely agree. But relativity doesn't necessarily mean Einstein, and it doesn't necessarily mean spacetime. Schrödinger equation is not relativistic btw in your Einstein sense, good luck diving into this, many others have tried and no one succeeded. Which doesn't mean that it is not relativistic in other sense, relativity is wider than Einstein.

[ayeaye]

Aether-Soup  particles are also the grid / matrix of time .

No. Aether soup particles are grid of space, not grid of time. So all your conclusions about time are irrelevant.

[ayeaye]

F6FLT, be friends. There are things you know more than i do, and there are things i know more than you do. This argument is intellectual, not personal at all. Here are not so many people, so everyone is important.

But please do at least one experiment showing that your copper ribbon coil has no overunity. You say that it has no overunity, without testing it, this is not scientific. Test it and show the results. It is important to know that something has no overunity, and more than that, from the results more may be learned about such coils with quite a unique properties. You have great tools, put them to use. Be friends, work together.

You may start your own thread about copper ribbbon coils, so people can learn more about such coils.

[F6FLT]

You mess up things pretty well.

Relativity is an important concept, i completely agree. But relativity doesn't necessarily mean Einstein, and it doesn't necessarily mean spacetime. Schrödinger equation is not relativistic btw in your Einstein sense, good luck diving into this, many others have tried and no one succeeded. Which doesn't mean that it is not relativistic in other sense, relativity is wider than Einstein.

Relativity implies space-time, and relativity is an Einstein's theory. "Relativity is wider than Einstein" means nothing to me. Something that is a theory cannot "be" comparable to something that is a man. If you mean that relativity is a theory that has not been fully defined by Einstein, I consider it's false (even if works of Lorentz or Poincaré contributed to the development of Einstein's idea, everyone influences each other). If you mean that relativity can lead us to understand things beyond Einstein's ideas or beyond the ideas of his time, you're right.

F6FLT, be friends. There are things you know more than i do, and there are things i know more than you do. This argument is intellectual, not personal at all. Here are not so many people, so everyone is important.

But please do at least one experiment showing that your copper ribbon coil has no overunity. You say that it has no overunity, without testing it, this is not scientific. Test it and show the results. It is important to know that something has no overunity, and more than that, from the results more may be learned about such coils with quite a unique properties. You have great tools, put them to use. Be friends, work together.

You may start your own thread about copper ribbbon coils, so people can learn more about such coils.

It's not a question of friendship, we talk to each other nicely, but it's a discussion about science and technology. Then we must use a scientific attitude (and method).

Proven theories that explain thousands of facts and observations, that are internally consistent and compatible with each other, are neither to be rejected without evidence nor replaced by ones would explain only a few particular cases of which it is not even certain, and by far, that they are not also explained by classical theories.

And when I see that this rejection is due to misunderstanding, I say so. Being friends means not hiding the truth from each other, even if it is only the idea we have of the truth and that it may differ between us. Note however that here, it is not only a simple opinion, for example I can justify that relativity guarantees causality, it is well known and necessary by formalism, and you cannot justify the opposite by a logical and rational demonstration.

An immodest attitude against current theories that have proved their worth must be justified by other solid theories that also explain what the former explain, and that explain in addition facts that the former would not explain, all well supported by observations and experiments. When this is not the case, the psychological bias of the Dunning-Kruger effect perfectly explains the situation. Point 4 of this effect indicates that being aware of the situation allows to leave it. My argument is also intellectual, not personal at all, funny idea to think otherwise.

So I think that when you understand that relativity doesn't prohibit time-tunnels but prohibits time travel in the sense that you mean it (possibility of paradox), that time does not necessarily have to be quantified (we don't know yet) but only QM has to be harmonized with general relativity because they are incompatible (while special relativity is compatible with QM), then you will no longer reject it. This does not prevent anyone from finding better solutions if relativity did not explain certain things in its field of application.

[ayeaye]

Proven theories that explain thousands of facts and observations, that are internally consistent and compatible with each other, are neither to be rejected without evidence nor replaced by ones would explain only a few particular cases of which it is not even certain, and by far, that they are not also explained by classical theories.

I'm sorry, but i reject everything that causes paradoxes, no matter how well established or "proven". Like spacetime implies that time is a dimension, and it is possible to move backwards by a dimension, thus i reject the concept of spacetime altogether, as a misnomer, or at least misleading.

It's not a question of friendship, we talk to each other nicely, but it's a discussion about science and technology. Then we must use a scientific attitude (and method).

No you don't use scientific method, as you make conclusions without doing experiments. And it evidently is personal, in spite that i didn't want it so.