Newton's Magnets

[Floor]

These aspects are equally "a critical issue".

1. energy expended in the removal and insertion of a shield
           And
2. effectiveness of the shielding
                They are not issues to me.

I know with a total certainty that many of these designs result in more mechanical work out
than mechanical work input.

I also know that most anyone who REALLY wants to know if this is so...... can ......
and in pretty short order.

The question is who among us REALY wants to know this with a total certainty?

Who wouldn't want a free energy device.
Every one wants free energy for their self.
Some even want it for everyone.

I realize that most will say / think of their self as wanting to know.
After all who wouldn't want to be the first to discover, or reveal or so on.

But I think the alone ness of standing within that kind of knowledge, is something
most people instinctively fear.  They are seekers, but also secretly hope not to find,
or perhaps more accurately fear to find.

Think it might be an easier thing, to be AMONG the first to know.

How about your self.  What do you think ?

Look at this proof.  Its not magnets, but it works for very
(in a way) similar reasons (90 degree to the force vector and balancing of forces).
          @

https://overunity.com/18234/new-version-of-flotation-device/msg535512/#msg535512

The above design, is not REASONALBY deniable.  Please understand, I'm not interested in argueing that point, or spending the another five years patiently waiting, (motly patiently ) as people discover that they really didn't    or      really did want'to know.  Its late in the "game".

EDIT / addendum

This gravity device did not work 1/23/22

            Peace out
                       floor

[Floor]

@ Telecom  and ALL READERS

Please notice.

You designate a next objective. 
      But why ?
If a first objective has not been arrived at AND DEFINITIVELY SO.

I'm asking YOU, what do YOU know.

I have heard the phrase "seems to" far too often.

Defecate or get off the porceline feces removal unit please.

            floor

[telecom]

These aspects are equally "a critical issue".

1. energy expended in the removal and insertion of a shield
           And
2. effectiveness of the shielding
                They are not issues to me.

I know with a total certainty that many of these designs result in more mechanical work out
than mechanical work input.

I also know that most anyone who REALLY wants to know if this is so...... can ......
and in pretty short order.

The question is who among us REALY wants to know this with a total certainty?

Who wouldn't want a free energy device.
Every one wants free energy for their self.
Some even want it for everyone.

I realize that most will say / think of their self as wanting to know.
After all who wouldn't want to be the first to discover, or reveal or so on.

But I think the alone ness of standing within that kind of knowledge, is something
most people instinctively fear.  They are seekers, but also secretly hope not to find,
or perhaps more accurately fear to find.

Think it might be an easier thing, to be AMONG the first to know.

How about your self.  What do you think ?

Look at this proof.  Its not magnets, but it works for very
(in a way) similar reasons (90 degree to the force vector and balancing of forces).
          @

https://overunity.com/18234/new-version-of-flotation-device/msg535512/#msg535512

The above design, is not REASONALBY deniable.  Please understand, I'm not interested in argueing that point, or spending the another five years patiently waiting, (motly patiently ) as people discover that they really didn't    or      really did want'to know.  Its late in the "game".

            Peace out
                       floor

Quite honestly, I'm  in line for building this machine - will try doing it asap.

[Floor]

Telecom, if you will, PLEASE consider doing a replication of the device   

@  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rRmbekUqJcs

This design variation, by the Tinman is quite elegant and is right on topic.

It is especially so AT THIS TIME.

I think it very important that as a FIRST principle,  the "Newton's magnets" principle is established.

It would be indellably established in the mind of anyone who actually and successfully builds one,
that magnetic force can be effectively neutralized along specific vectors.

The device is also an entry level build, in that most people could successfully complete it in short order.

MY build of it is nearly complete. If should be fun to play with, and it will be easily transported.

Who REALLY wants to know ?

                floor

[telecom]

It appears that on the outside there are two repelling magnets, and one magnet in between.
It is equally spaced, and attracts to one external magnet while being repelled by another.
The way I see it, attraction and repelling forces on the central magnet act in the same direction.
In this case, how they are being equalized?
(Its quite different from the case when outside magnets are synchronized through the
rack and pinion arrangement, where outside magnets are pulling each other in the opposite directions).