Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of this Forum, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above
Thanks to ALL for your help!!


polar reversal, ice ages and global warming

Started by Belfior, February 05, 2019, 06:45:29 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

F6FLT

It is absurd to think that science would be omniscient and infallible, just as it is absurd to think that it would be incoherent and that anything imagined instead would have the same relevance.
And there is also a big difference between sciences. We cannot mix those of life and earth, which have a complexity linked to the large number of parameters that determine it many of which being unknown, with the physics sciences which are based on simple elementary laws, but complicated to identify.

The laws of physics are well established. The resulting technology is proof of this. Even though they are not complete, new models will not radically challenge the current ones, more than Einstein's relativity has challenged Newtonian gravitation, still valid in most practical cases, only its field of validity has been reduced.

"Curved spacetime is not a force", that's true, and the misunderstanding comes from wanting to reason with everyday 3D flat space, when we are in 4D curved space. "How does that pull a spring+weight towards the Earth?", it is the question itself that is not relevant because it is based on the analogy of an effect. But there is no need for "pulling a spring+weight" to create an effect similar to that of "pulling a spring+weight". Comparison is not reason. A paradigm shift is needed.
The new paradigme here is that the notion of "something at rest" is not the same in a flat space as in a curved space.


Belfior

I think there are still valid concerns about the Einsteins theory, because to me it seems few liberties were taken by him to create special relativity.

You cannot divide by 0 and say that this time it was infinity

You cannot base your theory on unprivileged observers and then have just one observer.

All the way to Newton we have had scientists, that are taking huge liberties and as a result we have a Solar System that cannot be here. Yet we are here.

So what needs to be done is to go as far back as needed to get rid off the shit that does not work. There are basically 2 reasons why this is not going to happen:

1. There are people that are running the world and it is imperative to them, that the cattle does not know how the universe works
2. Modern science is way too invested in the current model to admit, that they are wrong. This would mean they are in on it, or they were too stupid to notice.

Every time some new evidence is found that supports this fallacy, they come up with more elaborate explanations why we need more mass or energy somewhere.