Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Stanley Meyers revisited

Started by Alfang, December 16, 2006, 11:32:06 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Alfang

I know this is probably an old worn out topic, But I've only been a member here for a week and familiar with stanley meyers and his claims for 2 weeks.
I've read so much on the internet about creating hydrogen from water ,read all of meyers patents and so on.
I have an electronics background, and for the last 19 years, an electrician. I have a very good fundamental background in all forms of electricity. One thing that puzzles me, If Stan really created a dune buggy that ran realtime 100% hydrogen, Why can no one duplicate his results?
A) it's a big farce
B) the documents and schematics provided to the us patent office are not correct. ie...missleading

My first thought was it's all crap,.,,,,, then again, many claim he was so paranoid of losing a patent that just maybe.....he gave the patent office a phony schematic and explaination of the principle of operation. So as to mislead people who might steal idea, or maybe he thought the Govt would deem his idea a national defense invention and just take it. either way, he gave just enough info to obtain a patent.

the reason I think he provided phoney schematics for his process? I think I know how he did it, and soon, I will atempt to "fracture" water, and create H2 with little or No electrical input. (probably little)

Before you call me nuts, and hopefully without giving it all away for free. The secret is in a resonant circuit. If any of you electronic experts know how a resonant "tank" circuit works, you should be able to figure this out..

And to those of you who think this information should be let out for the good of the world...
Let me make a billion dollars on it first, It won't take long.

So why do I even write what I have? I'm looking for 1 or 2 or more people who have better skills in electronics than me to work together to make this work. I have plenty of money, I'm not gonna scam anyone, and trust me, no one will scam me so forget it.

FreeEnergy

since you have a lot of electrician experience why not help us with something a bit easier? like the dual mechanical oscillation system by Mr. Mikovic. closing the loop on this one should not be hard!

http://www.overunity.com/index.php/topic,1763.0.html

Alfang

Hey Free, LOL this is actually one thats got my attention, and i am working on it.
I am trying to create it on wm2d, and to my surprise, finding the right ratio of pendulem weight length of pedulem, rocker weight etc...it's a tough one( i've only had wm2d for 1 day so am new to that) I do believe at this point, if theres a mechanical closed loop possible, it will be this .....thanks for your endorsement of me. I mean encouragement.

PS gravity wheels wont work,, same amount of energy going down as up reguardless of how you look at it, call it an out of ballance wheel will only keep you chasing your tail.

In the finnal conclusion, that 1 lb weight that comes down one side must go back up the other. reguardless of the path it takes.

And I fear that the energy imposed on the anvil of the pedulem project is not as much as we are guessing from the sound eminated from the "smack" of that anvil. I bet it sounds more
impessive than it is, and the energy there is not enough to perpetuate the swing of the pendulem, I hope i'm wrong.

Alfang

Oh, and BTW free, despite my lack of posts on here, I've spent a week almost, reading myself blind on here, I've read a lot of threads, I repect your opinions. A lot of people can call me a moron, if it came from you it would hurt. :)

g'day John

Alfang

And not only that, how many posts do i gotta do till I'm not a newbie?
TY this a is a gratuitist post no reply required.