Open Source Vs. Patenting

[lancaIV]

Patented objects are ever open source :
for DIY-self-producer,
for the industry after the 20(US:17)-years period
or the patent right only validate national .
Only a small part of the WIPO-archive ,energy related, publications did receive the right-award !

The russian TRIZ-Analytician Altschuller told to the world,
that 95% of all problem-solutions are in technical/physical existence,
we have only to search for the wished solution-effect
and where this is a permanent/periodical phenomen !
Sometimes we need -tactical/strategical-the  patent monopole right,
as example :
the Joseph C. Yater Thermionic cell,
cell materials are aluminium and copper,
with 1Kg foiled metals you can convert up to 50000 KW heat to electricity ,
with exspected 100% Carnot-efficiency !
Now we can also use,to need less cell-aerea/material,
the Argonne-Lab scientist Wilkinson invention-
a light-concentrator with an up to  20000x light density Quotient !
To realize the concentrator is ,relatively to the cell structure ,easy,
the cell can only be produced by machines,
so I do not see any chance to find  industrial interests without to receive warranties
for the investment risk ! 
The DIY-alternative would be the Ernesto Gomez thermovoltaic cell,
but the financial effect will be 10x higher KWH-price ,
compared with the Yater-cell !
I am ever pro-Patent when this "MONOPOLE" gives me and other positive effects !

Sincerely
            dL

[d3adp00l]

One problem my friend, if I see what you design, and I have money, then I get my lawyers to patent it, that I sue you into the stone age(and everyone you sold plans to). Then I change it a bit so it doesn't quite work show that product, no one has faith in it and it disappears. 7 years of slander and mystique put it out of the main stream, and that is about it. If you the original inventor decide to build it after the 7 years, I just threaten you and your family, heck I might even do something more than scare you. Or just buy you off, cough(Steven mark(s)). Its a game of chess and one doesn't win chess by making one winning move its a series of moves that leads up to that one move and keeping your opponent from seeing your end goal.

[FreeEnergy]

One problem my friend, if I see what you design, and I have money, then I get my lawyers to patent it, that I sue you into the stone age(and everyone you sold plans to).

sold plans to? Open Source is not about selling out.

[TheOne]

One problem my friend, if I see what you design, and I have money, then I get my lawyers to patent it, that I sue you into the stone age(and everyone you sold plans to). Then I change it a bit so it doesn't quite work show that product, no one has faith in it and it disappears. 7 years of slander and mystique put it out of the main stream, and that is about it. If you the original inventor decide to build it after the 7 years, I just threaten you and your family, heck I might even do something more than scare you. Or just buy you off, cough(Steven mark(s)). Its a game of chess and one doesn't win chess by making one winning move its a series of moves that leads up to that one move and keeping your opponent from seeing your end goal.

You just need to make a book and trademark it, you will be protected again ass that do that

[lancaIV]

"Photocopying" ,invented,so told us,by Australians,commercial realized by Japaneses,
led us copying myriad times a book or plan content,
a copyright is also only valid between B2B relationship !
No inventor,worldwide, can more stop the human-CAD2CNC2CIM evolution,
c=computering=calculation,with all "KALKUEL" !
Pythagoras:translated to german speech "GOTT ZAEHLT !"
use the ,PANDORA-,freedom of the publicated ideas !
Destroy illegal barrier !

S
  dL

p.s.: Please, do not misinformate the consumer about commercial rights and
       commercial obligations !
       Informate about their freedom and possibilities to repeat physical good
       ideas,products  and their effects,the use is the only signal of personal
       acceptance !