Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Magnet motor idea hopefully solved

Started by Low-Q, June 14, 2019, 10:59:32 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 4 Guests are viewing this topic.

shylo

Hi Vidar
I can't see how it could work.
What needs to be figured out is how to make a magnetic levitating rotor. Zero friction.
I'm working on it ,but everything I try is a fail.
artv

Low-Q

Quote from: shylo on June 21, 2019, 02:28:28 PM
Hi Vidar
I can't see how it could work.
What needs to be figured out is how to make a magnetic levitating rotor. Zero friction.
I'm working on it ,but everything I try is a fail.
artv
If positive torque is produced, like what's happening in a normal electro motor, there is no need for zero friction bearing. Normal electro motors works well without frictionless bearings.
The goal is to let the motor to do work. If it does in one way or the other, it can easily overcome friction in normal ball bearings.


That said, this idea is just an idea. The idea came to me because I cannot see why it shouldn't work. The only obstacle I can imagine is where the magnetic belt goes from one polarity to the other polarity. This point in the belt is staying stationary in the rotational direction, but it must move up and down and around the pulleys perpendiculary to rotation.


Since the magnetic belt is an array of magnets, the magnetic field that rounds the pulleys will go from in line to perpendicular between 0. 90, and 180° to the field from the stator magnet. The magnetic force will act radially on the pulleys and will not prevent rotation. The straight parts have no magnetic resistance when the magnet array moves perpendicular to the stator magnetic field.
At the point where the magnet array shifts polarity, there is a magnetic field that goes in line with the array. So when this point is at the top of the pulley, it lays perpendicular to the stator magnetic field.


In either case, the straight parts of the magnetarray/belt wants to turn around its own axis (wants to twist the straight parts) and create torque in the same direction before and after it has passed the center of each stator magnet, just like the electromagnets in an ordinary electric motor does.
The only obstacle I can think of is the behaviour of the point where the array goes from one polarity to the other, as this point is moving across the statormagnets as it rolls "backwards" with respect to the pulleys.. Just to remind you, the array/belt magnets are fixed with one polarity on one half, and another polarity on the other half. It is only the wave shape that is supposed to force the rotor to turn - like a surfer on a wave in the ocean.


Vidar

SciAnt

My motor generator testing with full bridge drive also support 1 phase drive
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=992QtAfu6FU

broli

Could you not also use gravity instead of magnetism, where one side of the chain has more mass than the other?

Low-Q

Quote from: broli on June 25, 2019, 04:32:43 AM
Could you not also use gravity instead of magnetism, where one side of the chain has more mass than the other?
I have thinked of that too, but see one obvious problem. The weights furter from the hub, lets say on the right side, will move upwards around each pulley while the left weights closest to the hub moves downwards around the pulleys to keep the chain at the bottom and top in the same position.
Since gravity acts on the weights around the pulleys as well as the weights in stright line between them, the torque is counterforced.
With an array of magnets, the field around the pulleys is not as attractive or repulsive to the stator field the same way as the straight portions where the field us in line with the stator field.
Gravity has no field polarization, but magnetic fields has. So it is a difference in the way those forces work.


Vidar