Tadahiko Mizuno LENR breakthrough COP of 5 and up to 10 Seeking Replication .

[ChileanOne]

https://www.resoheat.com/

C. O. P.: 5 claimed
without Palladium or LENR
( probably some do remember : the claim and the fallacy : https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Patterson_power_cell )

C. O. P.. ?
https://patentauction.com/patent.php?nb=11451
By the same:
https://patentauction.com/patent.php?nb=11462
The resoheat motor equipped with the Russian "magneto"- power amplifier. ?

resoheat 150 sqm house example : from 25000 KWh to 5000 KWh using Mizuno/resoheat !
                    5000 KWh Electric Energy to german e-grid Primary Energy(Factor 1,8) : 9000 KWh PE         

                   9000 KWh PE /150 sqm = 60 KWh PE /sqm
                   compared
                   2020 : E.U. Nearly Zero Energy( new) Building consumption standart : 30 KWh PE


                    60 KWh PE /sqm divided by "power amplifier" factor 5( Tanaka Saburo)
             
                                                                          or factor 10 ( " magneto/ Dr.Imris)     
       
                    means 12 KWh PE( T.Saburo) down to 6 KWh PE ( "magneto/Dr.Imris) primary energy

                   per squaremeter           
                     and annum : electro-technical "Active Solar Energy Standart"

Yes we all know that, But this is the first time Ever a researcher in the LENR field publishes a paper with the express and stated purpose of letting anyone who wants to try and replicate the experiment, giving all the details as best as they can (co author Jed Rothwell says he tried to make it as easy to read as possible, inspired in common appliances manuals like if this was a microwave oven or so). They are inviting people to replicate and Jed is available to answer questions directly or passing them to Dr. Mizuno if he can't answer directly. This is a first in the LENR scenario AFAIK.

[lancaIV]

https://www.hydrodynamics.com/ 100% eff.+ device
You all know this !
But by calculation you also know that to reach the Kyoto 1990 contracted - 80% GHG-emission reduction untill 2050 it is  not possible with low C.O.P. 5 devices ( standart 1990 : ground water heat pump).
In real the private household GHG-emission increased since 1990 !
The industrial GHG-emission from G7 estates only "outsourced" to emerging counties,mainly south-/east asia !

When I do an aluminium spoon into a water filled glas and catalyze this water : hydrogen/ oxygen bubbles ,which C.O.P. I get by this anti-oxidant process ?
Instead only aluminium Samuel Freedmans chemalloy ?
http://chemalloy.blogspot.com/2012/01/chemalloy-samuel-freedman.html?m=1
A million needles  " chemalloy" per sqcm surface?
This surface as shaft in a vacuum tube ?

Consume/ time process !

[ChileanOne]

https://www.hydrodynamics.com/ 100% eff.+ device
You all know this !
But by calculation you also know that to reach the Kyoto 1990 contracted - 80% GHG-emission reduction untill 2050 it is  not possible with low C.O.P. 5 devices ( standart 1990 : ground water heat pump).
In real the private household GHG-emission increased since 1990 !
The industrial GHG-emission from G7 estates only "outsourced" to emerging counties,mainly south-/east asia !

When I do an aluminium spoon into a water filled glas and catalyze this water : hydrogen/ oxygen bubbles ,which C.O.P. I get by this anti-oxifdant process ?
Instead only aluminium Samuel Freedmans chemalloy ?
Consume/ time process !

I think you are tossing links here. Hydrodynamics sent all its overunity claims through the window. It  is an efficient device but EarthTech buried the myth of it being overunity. I still think cavitation is important as a phenomena but not in the energy sense. Cavitation in aqueous media has been associated with transmutation and I bet hydrodynamics would find a lot of interesting stuff if they did experiments with that in mind, as has been done by Ryushin Ohmasa with his vibration system in aqueous solutions.


But returning to the topic of the thread, what it's at stakes here is the acceptance of LENR by the mainstream, In LENR-forum we are also engaged in a direct discussion to decide what experiments will be performed by the same Google Sponsored team that already tried and failed to find excess heat (and got published in Nature). The Google sponsored team asked directly what is the experiment that, if performed independently, would remove the question mark about LENR for both the LENR-community and the mainstream. Mizuno's work is at the top of the list at this moment.

[ramset]

 Thank you for the response and explanation .....To help Dr. MIzuno  as well the contact info for the original helper or coordinator .
It is  always nice to engage new people , especially people of like mind .
looking forward to that !
Also  we have University contacts worldwide that we can perhaps excess materials independently
Towards a replication here ...hosted at this  and other open source venues .


With much gratitude and respect
Chet K
Ps
Also love your comments on one of my favorite topics
cavitation .

[ChileanOne]

Thank you for the response and explanation .....To help Dr. MIzuno  as well the contact info for the original helper or coordinator .
It is  always nice to engage new people , especially people of like mind .
looking forward to that !
Also  we have University contacts worldwide that we can perhaps excess materials independently
Towards a replication here ...hosted at this  and other open source venues .


With much gratitude and respect
Chet K
Ps
Also love your comments on one of my favorite topics
cavitation .

Much Thanks!!!


I posted the news of Mizuno here in hopes that people would be interested in the opportunity to have a
Detailed experiment to replicate and with the bonus offer that the author is totally willing to help others replicate. This, as I already said, is a first, and I would speculate also and historical opportunity.


At LENR-forum.org we have many of the long time famous names in LENR as members, as McKubre, Ed Storms, Francesco Celani, Jean Paul Biberian, Jed Rothwell, etc. But the admins there managed to directly engage with the Google sponsored research team. The admins are also in direct contact with Deneum Energy. So it's a good place to go and share thoughts and learn from others and ask questions to Jed on replication.


In the case of cavitation, I am also really interested, mostly inspired by Ohmasa and his transmutation in aqueous media patent (transmutation that is enhanced by the presence of D2O and palladium plated vibration fins). Cavitation and transmutation go hand in hand. I intend to perform an analogue to Ohmasa's work using cavitation, but as a first step I want to do a replication of a recent work by a Chinese team which achieved transmutation from K to Ca in aqueous media. They claim the transmutation is due to their mixture with hydride salts, but they employed ultrasonic stirring and I bet that they are overlooking that as the causating agent of the transmutation. The only reason I found about their work was due that I was googling for +ultrasound +transmutation in google scholar.