Power from repelling magnets

[ayeaye]

An improved image of the spring scales, again this image is public domain. Spring scales are accurate because they are always linear by the Hooke's law.

Nothing else, and what else, as no one is interested. When an overunity greater than friction, and also continuous rotation, cannot be achieved, then likely no one is interested. And i don't know whether a continuous rotation can be achieved, all i know is that the way to achieve that, is to research these things thoroughly. Because continuous rotation if possible, likely requires an exact choosing of parts and solutions. That someone tries and accidentally achieves that, this is highly unlikely, for that one should know exactly what one is doing. That's all i can say, whether continuous rotation is possible or not i cannot say.

No voices against either. Where are all the vigilant scientists who always enforce the first law of thermodynamics, all seem to be silent, none has anything to say. I don't know whether thermodynamics works at zero point, but when something comes from the zero point, then it should be considered an unknown source, because not much is known about zero point, thus overunity.

[SkyWatcher123]

Hi ayeaye,

No voices against either. Where are all the vigilant scientists who always enforce the first law of thermodynamics, all seem to be silent, none has anything to say.

please don't encourage them, maybe the checks have stopped rolling in to pay them, or the tides are turning towards the light of truth.
peace love light   

[ayeaye]

I'm sorry, maybe i was not accurate. As i understand, when doing static measurements, that is when we don't move the object during the measurement, to get the real force, friction should always be added to the measured force. And friction is of course greater, when the radial force to the bearing is greater.

I tried a small disk with the computer fan ball bearings, a nut on the disk, and 8 of the 25 x 5 mm ceramic disc magnets one on another. When the magnet was at a certain angle, and at a certain distance, i saw that the attraction was somewhat greater in one direction than in the other direction. The speed with which it attracted was greater. The magnet had to be at some distance, there was no noticeable difference of forces when the magnet was near the disk. It didn't make the disk to rotate of course, couldn't overcome friction, and maybe also inertia. I felt that the forces there were likely great enough, so that they can be measured. That's all i can do, as i still have no spring scales and nothing to measure the forces.

[shylo]

That's why I'm trying to build a magnetically floating rotor.
A very difficult task,without any input.
I still have more idea's, I just wish I had more time and resources.
I believe it is possible, no bearings, and reduced Lenz, Lenz free is impossible. IMO
Lenz is just another form of friction.
artv

[sm0ky2]

Ayeaye
The field 'wants' to be spherical, round magnets help but
any magnet will round out at some distance away


And when we interact at rotating, round, angles
magnetic force can most certainly be unidirectional


The particular angle of interaction will vary with radiuses
But it is essentially the magnetic equivalent of a gravitational 'slingshot'
The field is bi-polar, so we consider only a portion of 1/2 of the radius for the maneuver