Gravity motor 2 rotor

[miloszlaw]

No it would not work the whole weight is on one center point.
You really need to understand Gravity and the point of potential.

It is true that the whole weight is based on the central point. Despite this, the wheel is unbalanced, you saw the movement.

[Turbo]

The wheel can be unbalanced but that does not change anything about the total weight on that central point.

That is the problem.

Do you not see the relationship between the weight and the weights.
Gravity acts on that center point not on those weights, their weight only add up to the total.

Think of it this way, you want to reduce the weight of the wheel.

[citfta]

The wheel can be unbalanced but that does not change anything about the total weight on that central point.

That is the problem.

Do you not see the relationship between the weight and the weights.
Gravity acts on that center point not on those weights, their weight only add up to the total.

Think of it this way, you want to reduce the weight of the wheel.

Sorry Turbo, but you are incorrect.  Gravity acts on each part of the whole.  As you can easily see in the video when there was weight farther from the axle on one side than the other the wheel DID turn.  When the weight got balanced on both sides of the axle then the wheel stopped.


Carroll

[citfta]

The problem is friction. Bicycle wheels are not suitable for this idea. The distances to the pins with bearings must be the same throughout the entire rotation. Otherwise, stress is generated that prevents rotation.

I see what you mean.  I wonder if it would work if you put a slot in the arm where it rides on the pin if that would let it keep rotating?


Carroll

[ARMCORTEX]

Besslerwheel.com is full of these devices, it does not work.

This is a pretty obvious idea to think of, if it worked we would have cars with this by now, dont you think?