Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Mechanical device uses geometry

Started by activ25, April 28, 2020, 01:15:04 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

activ25

I used that device :

https://postimg.cc/3kQHMSyn

To prove this one :

https://postimg.cc/gn81QsNY

creates also an energy. The energy from friction is lower than the energy from the movement of the circle.

Note1: I control in position the circle and the red wall with a motor (for the red wall) and a cylinder (for the circle). I count all the energy needed/recovered from these devices. I count also the potential energy stored inside the elastic for the example with the elastic or the energy from heating from the friction.


telecom

How exactly does it work =what is the main idea?

activ25

It is a counterexample to demonstrate the sum of energy is not always conserved. At start, I study the example with the friction, but even I see the slip, there is no method to calculate directly the energy from friction with 2 objects in movement in the same time, so I designed the example with the needle and the elastic.

The circle and the red wall are controlled in position by external devices (cylinder, motor), I count the energy I give and I count the energy I recover. The external devices control the 2 objects to have always the contact between the 2 objects, just the contact, not more.

For the two examples: the circle moves in horizontal translation to the right (the circle doesn't rotate around itself). The red wall rotates clockwise around A0. For the example with the needle+elastic: for a small movement of the circle+rotation of the wall, I lost d1*F from the movement of the circle and I win d2*F from the elastic. The sum of energy is (d2-d1)*F: the energy is destroyed. If I place a repusive force I create the energy, just place the needle in the other side of the dot of contact between the circle and the red wall (the needle must be blocked by the surface of the circle and the red wall).

I can change the elastic by a magnet, an electromagnet, a spring.

I'm not trying to build a continuous movement, I study the sum of energy during a small movement. To break the conservation of the energy I need only 2 object (with the friction): the circle and the wall. If I want to create the energy, I need 2 objects and 2 repulsive forces, one on the dot B the other on the needle.


lancaIV

Quote from: activ25 on May 01, 2020, 09:39:47 PM
It is a counterexample to demonstrate the sum of energy is not always conserved. At start, I study the example with the friction, but even I see the slip, there is no method to calculate directly the energy from friction with 2 objects in movement in the same time, so I designed the example with the needle and the elastic.

The circle and the red wall are controlled in position by external devices (cylinder, motor), I count the energy I give and I count the energy I recover. The external devices control the 2 objects to have always the contact between the 2 objects, just the contact, not more.

For the two examples: the circle moves in horizontal translation to the right (the circle doesn't rotate around itself). The red wall rotates clockwise around A0. For the example with the needle+elastic: for a small movement of the circle+rotation of the wall, I lost d1*F from the movement of the circle and I win d2*F from the elastic. The sum of energy is (d2-d1)*F: the energy is destroyed. If I place a repusive force I create the energy, just place the needle in the other side of the dot of contact between the circle and the red wall (the needle must be blocked by the surface of the circle and the red wall).

I can change the elastic by a magnet, an electromagnet, a spring.

I'm not trying to build a continuous movement, I study the sum of energy during a small movement. To break the conservation of the energy I need only 2 object (with the friction): the circle and the wall. If I want to create the energy, I need 2 objects and 2 repulsive forces, one on the dot B the other on the needle.


searchmachines : f.e. espacenet "endless band" as theme ?


                                              https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rolamite Principle,work concept,directions ?




                                              https://tpc.googlesyndication.com/simgad/10974894534753781211?sqp=4sqPyQQ7QjkqNxABHQAAtEIgASgBMAk4A0DwkwlYAWBfcAKAAQGIAQGdAQAAgD-oAQGwAYCt4gS4AV_FAS2ynT4&rs=AOga4qktsQlHV5Sn-DUBOfft8vztQGjJjg

activ25

The circle can be any curved shape like an ellipse.
The red wall can be any curved shape too like a part of a circle.
The needle can be anything small enough to be between the 2 surfaces of the circle and the red wall.
The elastic can be a spring, 2 magnets, 2 electromagnets, 2 electrostatic charges, etc.
The movement of the circle is not necessary straight line it could be curved.
The axis A0 is not necessary fixed on the ground, it could be in movement.