Free Energy: Oh I do need a philosopher!

[Zorabia]

Free Energy:
I read a book from a great mind, and this mind concluded that, Oh I do need a philosopher!

Yes, everyone does! It is such a tragedy for our modern times that physicists and biologists and the like never consult a philosopher.

I am not a philosopher by paper. I am, however, a natural born philosopher, and I thought I should give the free energy community a clear mind on the topic of free energy, because I read about so many misconceptions that I don't have the time to right all wrongs.

The first and last is energy. If I right this wrong, maybe all knots will vanish?

Energy: What is it? You can get an answer from a physicist and it is likely the wrong answer because it will leave you with a bundle of misconceptions. The real answer is everything. Energy is everything. It is uncreated and eternal. It is always 100%, even if one day you find it as 100% unavailable energy. It will never go away. It just is. Existence could be a giant whirlpool and it will just spin forever without needing batteries! It is that simple. The philosophical reason for this is that, if it is not true, that existence can indeed come from nonexistence, well, we have a problem. You might as well believe in magic as you can argue philosophically for the existence of magic as well as you can argue for the potential life stirring within nonexistence.

The big difference is between available and unavailable energy. If you want to drive your car forever, then you need an endless supply of available energy, and physicists scoff at the notion because the universe tends towards unavailable energy. So, do you see how silly "free energy" is in their minds?

Equally I scoff at physicists who believe that eternal unavailable energy (via the second law of thermodynamics) is the last state of affairs. If that was true, we wouldn't be here because no one created existence and, if she could die, we wouldn't be around to ponder the fact. So, from my philosophical perspective, only Roger Penrose is a physicist who is worth his salt! He is the first physicist that I know of that understands the philosopher and the problem of infinite regress. Your average physicist will simply state that: There was a Big Bang and then the universe runs down—but once it has run down, that is it! At this point you want to pull your hair from your head! Luckily, we do have Mr. Roger Penrose who sees the problem of infinite regress. You can't just use the Big Bang as some magic cure that will save you from the logical system. Thank God for Penrose!

I define free energy as an unlimited supply of available energy. If you had it, you would change the world forever. No more poverty, etc., etc..

The sun is not free energy because it is not an endless source of available energy.

What is the source of free energy?

The CCC (conformal cyclic cosmology) from Roger Penrose is the first step to real free energy. Philosophically speaking, the CCC is real free energy because the CCC is like the Phoenix Bird of legend that resurrects after its death and, the "free" part is the fact that this resurrection does not cost a thing. So, with all due respect, the CCC is real free energy. However, you need to wait till the end of time in order to witness the resurrection. Bummer. But, if I was a physicist, I would try to work out what would happen if we lived in a fractal universe such that the part = the whole. This way, the individual parts might resurrect, well, individually. Plug that baby in your spacecraft and you can drive forever, which is the whole point of free energy and why this is the right definition of free energy = drive forever. A real perpetual motion machine in the ultimate sense! And that is insane! You would transform the world forever.

Nobody paid for existence. Philosophically speaking, free energy is the only reality that makes sense.

The definition of perpetual motion machines is silly (to get something from zero sources), which is why such a thing will never work. You can't get something from: not anything. You need to change the definition if you want to philosophize about pmms. You know, real perpetual motion has nothing to do with perpetual motion machines! Overunity does not work for the same reason if by "unity" you mean existence. You cannot get "more" than what existence already is, lest you believe in something from not anything. See? The same silliness. Change the moronic definitions first. If you win the lottery you get overunity in terms of the cost, but you didn't break the laws of physics. Similarly, when free energy enthusiasts talk about "overunity," they do not mean the violation of conservation laws. And when another guy talks about it, he may mean that! So, it is frustrating. Get your definitions and terms straightened out first.

The Mechanism:
Take a piece of paper. Fold it a number of times. Cut a figure into the paper. Unfold the paper. In this scene, you will see how all atoms can be a single atom. But never mind that. If the universe evolved out of a single state and then copied itself, resurrection could work. That is, if the principle of evolution itself applies to the universe such that the universe's expansion is due to the copying of spacetime, then reality does look like our "piece of paper" where, if you folded all of spacetime back to its initial condition, you get the single state anew. This is important because, the second law of thermodynamics can then be seen as the thing that totally messes up our piece of paper when it is in its unfolded state. Say that the law makes a total mess of our figures such that they will be unavailable to work for us, as in energy unavailable for doing mechanical work. Say that the figures are squashed together (unavailable) and not spread out evenly (available) as they were in the beginning of time. But, when we fold the paper again and then unfold it, all that mess which the second law of thermodynamics caused is reset. Well, just try! All the mess, all the unavailable energy has been turned to available energy again through simple geometric principles! It is not a thing of magic. But it is a thing of beauty!

This is how existence is immortal.

Roger Penrose says that something like this can happen to the universe as a whole. My idea is that every part of the universe can undergo this process, not just the whole.

Conclusion: There is no such thing as perpetual motion machines or overunity devices. There is, however, real free energy.

Now, fold the cuboctahedron!

Why the cuboctahedron?

Because the cuboctahedron = everything.

If you disagree, you must disagree with Buckminster Fuller. And not even God can disagree with Buckminster Fuller!

So, why do some say that strings are the basic units of reality when Buckminster Fuller has already told us what the basic units are!

Why are we doing this? Because most physicists never conclude that, Oh I do need a philosopher!

But you might say that you don't need a philosopher to tell you that free energy is bullshit.

Bullshit: When I see a YouTube video about free energy or say, the movie Thrive: What on Earth Will It Take? the bullshit-detector goes off in my brain. I understand the skepticism! I can already hear Penn & Teller saying, Bullshit!!! Well, not so much so Teller! However, from my own free energy musings, then a real free energy device would be a dual torus! Why? If I have done my homework correctly, then the single cuboctahedron produces a dual torus.

So, if you want to work on toroidal devices, you have my philosophical blessing.

My big conclusion was that the dual torus has always existed. But ... how?

How come existence?
My idea: We can use the concept of nonexistence as a poetic tool to understand why existence is. Nonexistence does not move; it is motionless. If you sit on a beam of light and ride into the universe, you will see that motionlessness can only be accomplished by motion! "Can only be..." are the keywords here. Mull it over. If you can show that motionlessness = motion, then you have answered why there is existence rather than nonexistence, because even a hypothetical nonexistence does not move. You can reduce the concept of existence and nonexistence to the same ocean, so to speak.

The motionlessness is free of paradoxes such as infinite regress, so our motionlessness is a superb candidate for the beginning of all things. The motionlessness can have existed forever because there is no paradox that speaks against it.

If motionlessness = motion or the speed of light, then we need to find a geometry that is built for ultimate speed. This geometry is the cuboctahedron. Within the heart of the cuboctahedron, we find the tetrahedron. The tetrahedron is the basic building block of our universe, according to Buckminster Fuller. If you read Fuller's reasoning for why this is so, then you can get upset about, for example, String Theory that seeks alternatives to the basic building block. If the tetrahedron is not the bbb of reality, then cut off T-Rex's tail and see how the universe responds. I bet the T-Rex won't be happy either. My dinosaur example here goes to show that the tetrahedron is everywhere you look!

As I said, if I have done my homework, then the cuboctahedron generates the dual torus. In essence, Eternity is a dual torus. It is eternal and uncreated for the reasons we outlined above. This torus can be seen as a giant whirlpool. Say that the center of the whirlpool spins so fast that we get motionlessness, but further out you cannot keep up with the fast pace in the center, and we thus get what we call spacetime; namely the relative state that must stem from the absolute state of motionlessness, if we want to get rid of paradoxes such as infinite regress. Also, whirlpools can form baby-whirlpools that are not as strong and fast as their mother. Well, if you are not strong and fast, you are not motionless, so you must transform into spacetime. So, our universe can be a baby-whirlpool. This is how "nothing" generates "something."

This copying-process might be what dark energy is. Our earth could grow! if this is the process.

To further strengthen my belief that I am on the right track, I believe I solved the riddle of the Philosopher's Stone. You can't really call yourself a philosopher unless you are hunting the Stone, can you?

Heaven (fire) = the triangle. Earth = the square.
Father and Mother = opposite-sitting tetrahedron-arrays—like you will see in the flag of the Mother, the Father and the Child; Is(is) + Ra + El. Israel.
Earth (+ fire) = the cuboctahedron.
Water = the icosahedron.
Air = the octahedron.
Fire = the tetrahedron (e.g., the throne of God).
Leaf 11 (left, bottom): "Through Him who created the Heavens and the Earth I am The Philosopher's stone, and in my body I carry something the wise seek. If such a charm be extracted from me, it will be a sweet refreshment for you. I am an animal having father and mother, and father and mother were created; and in my body are contained the four elements, and I am before father and mother and I am a poisonous animal."—The Secret Teachings of All Ages

If you want to know the Father and the Mother, google this:

The Isotropic Vector Matrix - Nassim Haramein (Abstract from Cognos 2010 conference)

The Philosopher's Stone = the heaven + the earth + the four elements.

In addition, the Stone has a father and a mother; that is, you will find the cuboctahedron within a stack of tetrahedron-arrays (e.g., the 64 tetrahedron array). The cuboctahedron is composed of triangles (heaven) and squares (earth) and, when you fold the cuboctahedron, you get the four elements.

Note that it is impossible to find another solution for the simple reason that you will not find anything in the universe that consists of squares and triangles while simultaneously carries the four elements. Alternatively, I dare you to come up with another solid!
 
In case you were sleeping, the real Philosopher's Stone = the cuboctahedron.

And what is the cuboctahedron?

A: Our eternal motionlessness from above. It is the "nothingness" that birthed all things.

In reality, the cuboctahedron is the final state of the second law of thermodynamics. It is the grand death of all things! "Paradoxically," it is also where life is born. The Phoenix rises from where? Which is why I believe free energy is real.

And the cuboctahedron does look like a stone. Fitting name.

And where does this knowledge of the gods come from? 

[lancaIV]

www.Treffpunkt-Philosophie.de

[conradelektro]

Heaven (fire) = the triangle. Earth = the square.
Father and Mother = opposite-sitting tetrahedron-arrays—like you will see in the flag of the Mother, the Father and the Child; Is(is) + Ra + El. Israel.
Earth (+ fire) = the cuboctahedron.
Water = the icosahedron.
Air = the octahedron.
Fire = the tetrahedron (e.g., the throne of God).
Leaf 11 (left, bottom): "Through Him who created the Heavens and the Earth I am The Philosopher's stone, and in my body I carry something the wise seek. If such a charm be extracted from me, it will be a sweet refreshment for you. I am an animal having father and mother, and father and mother were created; and in my body are contained the four elements, and I am before father and mother and I am a poisonous animal."—The Secret Teachings of All Ages

The Philosopher's Stone = the heaven + the earth + the four elements.

How to heat your house: Have 100 Zorabians standing in your basement uttering the words about the philosopher's stone over and over (till you freak out and do need less heating).

How to light a light bulb: Have 1000 Zorabians utter their words in the direction of a windmill which drives a dynamo (dispensing the energy for a dim light).

How to drive a car: Have 10 Zorabians shut up to be able to push your car (but use your gas engine to take flight in case they start speaking contrary to your orders).

Greetings, Conrad (who was enlightened by the Zorabian philosopher's stone)

[lancaIV]

Zorabian, also in "           ",you see the partial -limited " -left to right-" space,you should find heaven,God,the NIRVANA or all expressions which and whose represents the highest -untouchable-worth from all of us !


Em "nada" totum also est : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QPA1wBBcO0A


Em "totum" also nada est

[Zorabia]

Wassup with all the weird replies?