chainreactor - self reloading gauss gun

[gaby de wilde]

Here is an idea I've been playing with.

http://gabydewilde.googlepages.com/chainreactor

ingredients for reproduction:

2 metal balls
1 vertical tube (for the balls)
2 magnets

We put a ball in the tube floating between the 2 magnets and allow gravity to pull it below the center of the magnets. Angle depends on weight and strength of the magnets. [1] Move away the magnets and change the angle so that the field is just strong enough to prevent the ball from dropping down the tube.

We now drop the second ball at the top.[2] In stead of accelerate and decelerate from the magnetic field[3] it accelerates and smashes into the first ball that is much further outside the magnetic field.[4]

The effect can be increased by using a row of magnets.[5] The last ball in the row is always further outside the field as the ball that just entered it.

The effect is known as a Railgun. But those designs either smash the ball into the magnet, place the projectile it behind some hook or of course use electromagnets.

In the version I've described using more balls the launched ball can be far away from the magnet, it's merely held-up by the magnetised ball above it. The range of that field is extremely small. The incoming ball will already have enough speed to disturb it.

The magnets now do longitudinal work for free. (at no charge)

What do you think?
.

[gyulasun]

Hi,

You have a very interesting idea, why do not you carry on making it to be a self-repeating movement?  I mean the the ball escaping from the magnets' would go inside a curved tube back to the top to trigger the next kick.
If the energy gain for the kicked ball is not enough for a return due to much friction inside the tube for instance, then you could place the entrance point of a SMOT to the highest position the ball is able to climb up and then the SMOT may cover the rest of the missing distance to the top of your setup. 
Would be worth testing?

rgds,
Gyula

[gaby de wilde]

I've bought the ingredients and tested it quite a few times now.  It appears the world works the way I thought it would. It's just as surprising as to see how little response it had so far. I was already astonished by the hand full of page views Milkovic accumulated over the passed 5 years.

I find it so hard to believe but all evidence points at the same thing. It's not the perpetual motion that is impossible. Everything that is thought-of as impossible is not investigated by anyone. It is impossible to pursue something if you know it can't be done.

It's hard to believe but the entire world population didn't really look for over 300 years, extremely little constructive thinking was done. Those that had the best chance to find it where the most convinced it was impossible. They advocated not to go look for it.

It doesn't take any effort to build the chainreactor as I've described it and drawn it. It's even less complicated as a smot? Hard evidence of the short-sight theory. I'm still not convinced but all evidence points at it. LOL

I don't see any millions jet, it's hard to give away my invention for free. Have to trick people into visiting my website. I'd better update the way it looks. lol

For the reactor to lead out a lot of energy one would either need enormous balls or use a magnetic field to replace gravity. With the later it could generate quite a lot I imagine. But I didn't even make a drawing so lets not get ahead of ourselves. V1 is good enough the way it is.
Everyone should build and study it.

Thanks for your comment

[gyulasun]

Hi,

I think most of the people on these forums are watchers, mainly sitting on the fence and unless someone shows them an undeniable fact of a selfrunner or a proved/tested/rebuildable overunity device they will not do much...  This is the result of the century-long-taught view of energy 'laws'. Hard to defeat it in one's mind...

In your tests, what solution did you think of bringing the balls back to the place where they could again restart giving the kicks? Did they gain enough energy to return?
If they do (or there are means by a SMOT or something else for them to return), then a small prototype would surely be enough to wake up / convince people your setup is a selfrunner. It would not matter that the work it would do would be just enough for its own energy needs to selfrun, your setup would then be an undeniable reality for breaking the energy laws.

regards,  Gyula

[gaby de wilde]

Hi,

I think most of the people on these forums are watchers, mainly sitting on the fence and unless someone shows them an undeniable fact of a selfrunner or a proved/tested/rebuildable overunity device they will not do much...  This is the result of the century-long-taught view of energy 'laws'. Hard to defeat it in one's mind...

yeah, the people who are most interested are not very interested. lol They are their own evidence.

In your tests, what solution did you think of bringing the balls back to the place where they could again restart giving the kicks? Did they gain enough energy to return?

gravity pulls the row down to fire again. (see attached image)

http://gabydewilde.googlepages.com/chainreactor
gabydewilde - chainreactor

If they do (or there are means by a SMOT or something else for them to return), then a small prototype would surely be enough to wake up / convince people your setup is a selfrunner. It would not matter that the work it would do would be just enough for its own energy needs to selfrun, your setup would then be an undeniable reality for breaking the energy laws.

regards,  Gyula

It's not a machine so the setup displaying the effect should be as simple as possible.

I'm convinced that you can make it self-run in a loop just as well as I can, maybe even better.