RANT CAFFE ASYLUM

[gyulasun]

...

We do not use Batteries, other than to Start the Machines, then they are removed from the Circuit - Don't listen to: FAKE NEWS!!! 

EMJunkie,

Indeed, we should not listen to fake news. You fail to mention how long that circuit remains in operation when the batteries are removed.  Even the "eternal" flash light circuit which is a much higher buzz on your forum now than the POC, cannot run from capacitors for long: the capacitors lose charge and the circuit dies out. Prove me wrong if this is not so! 

So who spreads fake news? 

PW has proven himself to have such poor knowledge in Electronics Engineering, that not a single person here should listen to him, many others have completely no idea, when they think they do, the most dangerous approach to Science a Soul could have!

Says who?  A desperate guy who uses Ohms Law for a LED lamp rated for 12 V operation at 7.5 W power and who calculates it to be 30 W when the same lamp is run from 24 V. Independent measurements clearly proved: the power consumed changes around the nominal consumption only a few percent due to the built-in constant current drive for the LEDs. 

So who has poor knowledge in Electronics Engineering?

Picowatt certainly has good knowledge, for instance his latest clever suggestion of connecting the lamp loads directly to the DC power supply to check the power levels at equal brightnesses has been fruitful: Itsu just did that test on the other forum and confirmed that his input and output power measurements by the oscilloscope on the POC circuit built as shown in Captainloz video 9 are well within the ball park i.e. the DC tests on the lamp confirms the power levels and hence the COP < 1. 

So what can we think of your POC? You have never shown correct, in fact any, measurements to prove your COP > 1 claim.

Chris, when will you look into the mirror?   You blame here several people for your own "weaknesses".

Gyula

PS Will you surprise us to stop your childish behaviour?

[picowatt]

The self-proclaimed Hero's have greater knowledge than everyone else already!

Talk about the the kettle calling the pot black...

EMJ,

In the very first video that you posted years ago, you used 15 watts from a DC supply to light a 3.6 watt incandescent light bulb to about half or so its rated brightness.

In the second video you posted, you used around 1 watt from a DC supply supply to light a similar incandescent light bulb to even less brightness.

Jump ahead 5 or 6 years to the present, and a replication you have endorsed as working properly and in accordance with your "theory" is using 17 watts from a DC supply to light a pair of 2.8 watt incandescent light bulbs (CaptaniLoz's video #5).

In a more recent video, (CaptainLoz's video #9) 19 watts from the DC supply is lighting a 2.8 watt incandescent lamp that looks slightly overdriven and a 7.5 watt LED lamp.

The above observations are just that, observations, and I really don't see how they can be in dispute.  Based on those observations, the circuit's appear to be very, very, inefficient.  Much more so than what could be achieved by connecting the loads directly to the DC supply.

If your POC is overunity to the degree claimed, and as your test equipment would have us believe, similar observations would instead be indicative of overunity operation.

For example, it would be very impressive if the DC supply was only providing 3 or 4 watts and yet you were able to illuminate to full brilliance the pair of 2.8 watt incandescent lamps as confirmed with a lux meter and connection of the lamps directly to the supply.

But that is never the case, the supply always appears to be providing significantly more power to the circuit than the loads appear to dissipate. 

PW

[picowatt]

EMJ's response to my post above before he deleted it:

WOW CONCLUSIVE EVIDENCE!!!

Of being a total CLOWN!!!

Hahahahaha what a total dufus!

How Scientific of You McClownage!

   EMJ

PW

[picowatt]

EMJ's second reply to my same post:

What a total diabolical mess of Non-Sense!

TOTALLY non scientific, total NON-Sense!

See why Picawatt can not be trusted! There is not a SINGLE bit of Scientific approach here at all!

NOTHING but diabolical Mess!

This seems to be a common theme on this Forum! Nothing but a bunch of Guessers!

Picowatt needs to be renamed to PicaGuess, or GuessaWatt

   EMJ

EMJ,

Dispassionate and objective observation is a major component of the scientific method.

PW

[onepower]

In the news...
They finally got a look at donny trump's taxes and it's no wonder he was so afraid and desperate to hide them.

Turns out he is a loser and going bankrupt. Not only that but apparently he's paid almost no tax and been illegally writing off all his personal expenses as business. He would probably be homeless if he didn't give himself and his friends hundreds of millions of dollars in tax breaks.

Apparently the Russians and many other foreign countries and groups have also been overbooking his hotels as bribes. Oh dear it looks like dipshit donny may not get reelected, maybe going to prison instead, lol.

It also explains why he's so desperate to rig the election and the supreme court or as donny jr said...were all going to jail. What a shit show.