Ultrasonic / mechanical cavitation used to transmute matter

[synchro1]

@ChileanOne,

The notion of the electron is deficient. The actual transformation can be viewed as vibrational and intertwining with the nucleus. Acoustic vibration and sand patterns are a better example. Pockets form in the outer shell at those nodes, and the nucleus transformed.

[ChileanOne]

There's a lot of theories about and all might have part of the picture right, but I think electrons alone can't create new nucleons. I think there is a lot we don't know, but certain things are moderately clear. Electron clusters as described by Kenneth Shoulders Can rearrange nucleons and transmute matter, but themselves can't become nucleons.

[synchro1]

gold wire should transmute to bismuth;

[synchro1]

An Oxy-acetelene torch would raise both samples of copper and the altered material to the melting point. If the copper melted first. it would prove the other material was selenium, if it them melted at its listed temperature; Somewhat higher then copper. Pretty simple! What then?

[stivep]

https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s42452-019-1391-6
if ultrasound creates  transmutation  of matter than what happened to energy released from that transmutation?
______________________
additional materialhttps://www.worldscientific.com/doi/abs/10.1142/S0217979217501685
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xQ-_T1nWqP0
https://iscmns.org/2018/11/jcmnsv27/




Opinion of my friend
Dr Roy.
Theoretically,
I guess the generic answer would be :
that if and when all the mass, binding forces, and other mass-energy components of the interaction
were added up, mass-energy would be conserved.
-, mass-energy conservation is, at best, a local 'law' that breaks down when you consider
that the volume of the Universe changes over time - a Universal mass-energy conservation
law would require a steady state Universe, which is not where you or I am living in.
Piezonuclear Decay or Piezonuclear Fusion is a very dubious theory, as far as I am aware, it remains unproven.
One of the authors that you cited,   Wesley, - Fabio Cardone (along with his colleague Alberto Carpinteri)
have caused the resignation of Italian politicians, when they had planned to elevate them to positions
of importance (after all the dust settled, no one was elevated anywhere,
and they went back to their school and continued their unproven research).
Piezonuclear decay reads like Cold Fusion, with an Italian accent.
The claims that his laboratory findings
"could appear as a confirmation of the DST theoretical hypothesis" seems rather absurd, since
DST is also a rather abstract unproven theory, based upon a non-Einstein variant of General Relativity
that would suggest that some frames of reference are better than others, which sounds like it trashes
General Relativity as most physicists understand it.
It sounds as though Fabio is 'cherry picking' his data, since he mentions
in his article that his results are very sensitive to location and orientation of his experiment
- my guess is that he has a LOT of data points that fail to show any Piezonuclear decay,
so he just 'doesn't waste his time on those results'.
I don't know him, but I guess that he is some crackpot that got tenure in a department of
Chemistry and fell down a rabbit hole. People publish all manner of nonsense
these days just to keep the journals full of stuff.

Wesley's opinion:
I must agree with Dr Roy.
Wesley