Free Energy RANT CAFFE ASYLUM

[solotraveler]

Hi
This forum has a lot of participants with plenty of knowledge about today's technologies.
I would like to go through and see what went wrong in the beginning and why are we still building very clumsy electrical equipment, when today we know so much more about electricity and nature. We definitely need to put some of the ideas into solutions for power generation, where we have the biggest crisis for humanity. Solar and wind are not working efficiently and the reason is - we are still going forward with the same thinking.  I am open to discussion, about  some of my own ideas that I have been working on for quite a while, to those that are interested.
Best Regards 

[Floor]

                       anthropogenic sourced pollution and volcanic sourced pollution

"Volcanic derived pollution has major detrimental impacts on the earth ; the atmosphere, human/animal health, marine ecosystems, and vegetation are all equally impacted by volcanic pollution. Volcanic pollution, although not as prevent as anthropogenic sourced pollution, does have international impacts. Volcanism should not be ignored in terms of pollution; as mentioned before one volcanic eruption has the opportunity to outgas as much carbon dioxide in one day than 250 years of anthropogenic activity (Primer, 2010). Due to the fact that on average only between 50 and 60 volcanoes erupt each year, there is not nearly an adequate amount of volcanic activity to equal or to surpass the amount of anthropogenic sourced pollution (USGS, 2009). Even supervolcnoes, that have had only 8 eruption  within the span of millions of years, do not have enough frequency to equalize with anthropogenic source pollution (USGS, 2014). On the occasions were volcanoes do erupt, however, aerosols and other polluting gases are dispersed quickly and expansively. The United States Geological Survey along with many other international environmental organizations recognizes the domestic and international hazards that can originate from volcanism; these organizations continually observe and analyze volcanic activity in order to minimize risk that comes with unawareness."

                   https://intlpollution.commons.gc.cuny.edu/volcanic-pollution/

[onepower]

Bolt

Now of course localised pollution from thousands of factories pumping out crap is another problem and should be dealt with accordingly.  BUT they should NOT be forcing the average person to pay the price thru increased fuel prices and restrictions as a result.  The idea of a carbon footprint is in itself a huge money making scam.  Forcing electric cars en-mass will not solve any problems they are so incredibly short sighted.  There not even enough raw materials to make the electric motors let alone the charging infrastructure in any country to find additional hundreds of Giga watts of power.

It is a scam and the oil industry knew about global warming 50 years ago and also predicted peak oil around 2040. This was the oil industries own internal emails not some politicians. You ain't seen nothing yet and here in Alberta there talking about $200 a barrel oil by the end of next year. You see the demand for oil was already starting to spike as the population and industry grew and the only thing keeping it in check was the global pandemic.

Your going to be seeing oil, gasoline/diesel and natural gas triple in price over the next year as the market corrects itself. So a small carbon tax is a joke compared to the killing the oil companies intend to make.

I'm not sure why everyone is whining about electric vehicles and I don't care what they think. I bought a hybrid SUV and it's awesome and my next vehicle will be 100% electric. I'm not going to pay someone $200 to fill my SUV with gas when I can charge an EV for $20. Not to mention the fact an average EV can blow the door off most gas powered jalopies. In fact EV's are destroying the gas powered competition in car racing and breaking all kinds of records. So your definitely on the wrong side of history if you think some gas guzzling piece of crap running at 20% efficiency is the future.

Regards
AC

[AlienGrey]

.This might be of interest >>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P6WQTj15jt0

Sil

[bolt]

I am not against electric cars its the charging that is the issue.   Yes the range is improving and the batteries are better now than just a couple of years ago.  Right now i use about 5kwh per day in my house.  If i buy an electric car this is going to surge to like 50kwh per day.  Then my wife will charge hers too now we are up to 100kwh per day?

What country anywhere can cope with this demand?  The cables and transformers cant handle it and there is no power generation capabilty to provide this amount of power.  Over the last couple of decades we have been using less and less power thru energy effecient TV's, LED lights, low power PC's etc.  This has offset the need to upgrade the infrastructure and build more nuke plants but instead it only just copes with very little overhead margin.

Potentially we are looking at a 20X increase for every household.  Currently we only have about 2% of the charging points required to provide on the road top ups.  As i mentioned before there isnt enough raw materials on earth to make the electric motors.

There is only ONE mainstream solution  .....depopulation.  Its the one Bill Gates and others are rolling out now.