AC voltage from single magnetic pole

[nix85]

Just don't imply i am not transparent, i did much for OU awareness over last almost 10 years.

These things are still done in privacy, otherwise they ALWAYS fail.

If you are successful, later you can share all or as much as you feel fit.

Often the solution is sooo simple your intuition tells you "how did i not see it before" and then you realize technology is not the issue, but mankind's awareness and morality.

Look at Don Smith, James Schwartz, Kapanadze or hundreds of other OU inventors.. They gave general directions, not step by step instructions.

Even if exact instructions are given these systems are often delicate and hard to replicate.

Don't give man a fish, teach him how to fish, give him knowledge, inspire him, push him in right direction.

No matter how much i was for it before..I am now more for sharing of essential electrical knowledge that's lacking, than sharing a-b instructions how to build a overunity device.

[bistander]

Cores are suicide. Enough said.

Hi nix85,
"Cores are suicide." I like to hear more about your statement. Please elaborate.
Thanks,
bi

[nix85]

Well, there are many OU systems with cores, it's just my preference.

Figuera, Kunel..use cores.

I don't.

[ramset]

You seem to have a strong opinion on OU being readily available
And many to chose from ?


Perhaps just one anomaly ?


However small?


This must be your reason for engaging
You have seen things ??


One quick question since air cores are being
Mentioned


Please don't be offended
Is Rick F someone you consider?

[partzman]

Just don't imply i am not transparent, i did much for OU awareness over last almost 10 years.

These things are still done in privacy, otherwise they ALWAYS fail.

If you are successful, later you can share all or as much as you feel fit.

Often the solution is sooo simple your intuition tells you "how did i not see it before" and then you realize technology is not the issue, but mankind's awareness and morality.

Look at Don Smith, James Schwartz, Kapanadze or hundreds of other OU inventors.. They gave general directions, not step by step instructions.

Even if exact instructions are given these systems are often delicate and hard to replicate.

Don't give man a fish, teach him how to fish, give him knowledge, inspire him, push him in right direction.

No matter how much i was for it before..I am now more for sharing of essential electrical knowledge that's lacking, than sharing a-b instructions how to build a overunity device.

Nix,

I do not agree with your philosophy highlighted above.  Why?  Well first, show me one valid replication of the inventors you listed above or any inventor that gives only general directions.  Second, most replicators if not all need "instructions" not theory.  For example, I give you one of my theoretical devices with enough info for a device build.  This resembles Citfta's post.

For any that might be interested, this is an improved design of coil/core used in tangential induction.  The idea is to have as large an area in one polarity as compared to the opposite polarity in a coil's        current that has been induced with a tangential PM field.

The pix below is the PM and coil assembly used for this test.  The elongated core is 7 pieces of 1/4 ferrite E cores with 30 turns of 15-34 litz wire and the PM was moved past the core by hand.

The first scope pix shows an area of 2.975mAs for the total current waveform.

The second scope pix show an area of 4.265mAs for the positive area of the waveform.

From this we can calculate the negative area from 2.975mAs-4.265mAs = -1.29mAs.  Therefore, the positive to negative ratio is [4.265]/[1.29] = 3.32:1 .

What good is this?  Well, by using a balancing magnetic or electromagnetic arrangement on a rotor that will null the Lenz effect from the positive PM induction in this case, a very low drag PM generator can be built which should produce OU.

Regards,
Pm   

Pm