Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



AC voltage from single magnetic pole

Started by nix85, October 04, 2020, 10:16:36 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 3 Guests are viewing this topic.

nix85

Quote from: citfta on October 09, 2020, 11:44:43 AM

That is just not true.  I tried the same set up with several different loads and the current and voltage were always in phase.  Now YOU show us something that proves us wrong.


Carroll

Which means you got too much resistance and capacitance in the circuit and you have proved nothing. Also you used way too low speed, inductive reactance is XL= 2πfL.

Let's bring in someone whom you deem an authority as proposed, let's hear his opinion if current lags voltage in purely inductive circuit when induction is done by moving magnet.

How bout Thane Heins, is he a member here?

NdaClouDzzz

Quote from: citfta on October 09, 2020, 10:58:40 AM
So what happens when a magnet is moving past a coil?  The coil will have a voltage induced into it whether there is a load connected to the coil or not. This can easily be seen by just connecting a scope to the open leads of a coil and seeing the voltage on the scope...

Question: Does the scope not represent at least a little bit of load on the coil, and wouldn't using a separate sensing coil similar to that used in the following video be a more accurate test? https://youtu.be/hw2bBYYHp34?t=89
Thank you.

citfta

Hi NDZ,


That is a valid question.  But the input impendence of a modern scope is typically several megohms.  And I was using the 10x position on the probe.  So any loading of the coil by the scope is so small as to be almost unmeasurable.


Carroll

NdaClouDzzz

Quote from: citfta on October 09, 2020, 12:11:43 PM
Hi NDZ,


That is a valid question.  But the input impendence of a modern scope is typically several megohms.  And I was using the 10x position on the probe.  So any loading of the coil by the scope is so small as to be almost unmeasurable.


Carroll

Thank you.
Regards

citfta

Quote from: nix85 on October 09, 2020, 11:54:39 AM
Which means you got too much resistance and capacitance in the circuit and you have proved nothing. Also you used way too low speed, inductive reactance is XL= 2πfL.

Let's bring in someone whom you deem an authority as proposed, let's hear his opinion if current lags voltage in purely inductive circuit when induction is done by moving magnet.

How bout Thane Heins, is he a member here?


You are the one making the claim.  I asked you to back up your claim and now you want someone else to bail you out.  Show us the proof you are correct!