Lords of the Ring

[giantkiller]

@all,
Thanks for the input. I am pondering the areas of physical, electrical, & effect designs at the same time. I see the differences of the inclusion and exclusion of cores, Solid state compared to inclusion of transformers. I don't want to run off in the wrong direction but I do agree that the kicks are gotten with +12v and 0.5 amps. I think that can get better. It has too.
So I heed all instructions. It could be that some Bedini configs are true and other combos are not.

On another note I thought I would share this. It is my next frequency toy. It is way outside the box with me.
http://www.stick.com/

--giantkiller.

[mrl]

Very bad forum constant database error.  Forum useless.

[giantkiller]

Ok, so scope this out:
http://amasci.com/tesla/tesceive.html
The quote from inside is this:
NOT CRACKPOTTY AFTER ALL
Note that this does not violate any rules of conventional physics. If we add stronger EM fields, they sum with the incoming EM plane waves and cause these radio waves to bend towards the tiny antenna, and the antenna absorbs them. This increases the antenna's EA (effective area, or effective aperture.) We can use this process to alter the coupling between the antenna and the surrounding space, but the total energy still follows the conservation law. The altered fields only change the "virtual size" or EA of the antenna.


Sound like a TPU, eh? Turbo and I had discussions on this a number of times. We both saw the the bending and the vortex field flowing into the ring.

Here's the interesting part. If we wish to receive power rather than signals, a critical issue arises.

Driving a tiny antenna with a large signal will create large currents and heat the antenna. Small antennas are inefficient when compared to half-wave dipoles. If we wish to maximize the virtual aperature of a really tiny antenna (e.g. make our 10KHz pie-plate coil act 10KM across,) we'll quickly be frustrated by wire heating. All the extra received energy will go into warming the copper. Possible solutions: use superconductor loops, or at low frequencies use the nearest equivalent to an AC-driven superconductor: a rotating permanent magnet(can you say rotating field?) or rotating capacitor plates.


I think I did this...?

He's produced kicks and has attained heat. Copy on gnosis.com from Mannix about the GK4.

Sound like more tuning, eh? So now I am thinking more controller turns to emminate more micro fields over the collectors increasing the antennea effect. More turns, Agh...
Or more loops in the coax based TPU, or lamp wire for more strands.
More controller windings can lessen the drive current. What if more windings of 30awg to lower the voltage requirement.

--giantkiller. Did I just crack this nut again? This excerpt does sound like a Bedini rendition.

[Grumpy]

No.

[giantkiller]

Gk5 wound and jumpered. 4 1/2 inch ring.
This is bifilar 16awg speaker wire, 3 layers one inside the other(concentric) of 10 turns. I took Otto's jumpering to the next level. This is from top to top, middle to middle, bottom to bottom from outside to middle to inside by 4 segments. Confused yet?
I can also jump it to 390721 transformer spec. That'll be next.
So this can be made like a triple mobius going in any layer direction or any depth direction. Looks like 108 combinations total.
Bottom line is : 4 segments of 3 concentric layers with dual runs of 41 strands each. Combinations like a Rubik's cube. I got 6 coils per segment. Total 24 coils, 984 strands.
Core is Easyflow audio 8awg, 700 strand silver coated copper, 4 turns.

This is hemi. Simple goal is bigger kicks. I really don't have to. Just to see how the Easyflow performs. Possibly get a vortex action with one of the jumper configs.
Granted, the strands are not insulated individually. This is the skin effect test also. Then on the Easylow, why is each strand silvered if they are not individually insulated? We shall see. I take chances to prove or disprove group imposed boundaries.

This one's for you Sonny.

--giantkiller. 2 days left.