Fran McCabe (RIP) Gyroscope Demo

[NdaClouDzzz]

Fran was on to some good stuff before he died. He did a lot of video's on his Gyroscopic ideas. I think that his best was shown in this video:
https://youtu.be/D7Q0sF3z-qA

RIP Fran

[MagnaProp]

RIP indeed. An intriguing demonstration. I'm not exactly sure how the device in that video works. What causes it to reciprocate back and forth? I can only see it reciprocating if the secondary spin, the one that spins the two spinning gyros, is no constant. By that I mean it would reciprocate if the secondary spin speed up and down in short bursts what would cause the device to abruptly jump forward for a second.

[NdaClouDzzz]

I agree, very intriguing demo! I can't explain it but hopefully nix85 will weigh-in and give us some insight, as he is one of the only members here that seems to fully grasp this stuff.
Fran made a lot of videos that can be found on YouTube. Here is one in which he goes into a lot of detail: https://youtu.be/TauNcWlhA58


"Most technically savvy people know that the primary behavior of rapidly spinning gyroscopes is to strongly resist any change in the angular orientation of their spin-axes. However, rapidly spinning gyroscopes are perfectly happy and well-behaved with any movement along that axis, or relocation of that axis which remains exactly parallel to its original orientation during such movement or at its new location. Most of those technically savvy people above have had the opportunity to play with a toy gyroscope and have forced the gyroscope's spin-axis to accept an angular change and have thus, directly experienced a phenomenon called "precession," which resists that applied force with a force of its own and of proportional intensity.

Gyroscopes are used primarily in guidance instruments and/or controls in moving vehicles, for example, gyroscopic compasses. In a much more limited range of application, and at a much larger physical size, they also serve as dampers to counter such unwanted oscillations as "roll" of a ship. Ever since the end of WWII and the entrance of the V2 rocket, and then spacecraft, not only has their sophistication and accuracy increased exponentially, but entirely new, equivalent technologies have entered the field, primarily in lock-step with that of other oscillation-based electronic equipment; e.g. Royal Rife's electronically controlled microscope system.

The speaker has devoted a sizable part of his discretionary lifetime conceiving, building, and experimenting with unique gyroscopic systems, that are quite robust, and in some cases, quite powerful. He now views, as indigenous, the relationship between the behavior of flywheel-type gyroscopes and most other physical phenomena. As he sees it, forced deviation from the natural precessional behavior of flywheel-type gyroscopic systems is identical to the motion fundamentals imbedded in other natural, physical phenomena, i.e. electron spin motion in atoms, DNA spirals, weather, cosmological phenomena, and oscillating motion in numerous other examples in physics.

These arc-motion fundamentals exist in the mechanical distillations derived from over 25 physical experiments including: pulsed anti-gravity; spiral motion; motoring by both natural and powered precession; motion reversals; pendulum-tuned motoring; extremely rapid linear motion; a visual-mechanical demonstration of inertia; etc.

The four basic, matter-building-block motions are: orbits, translations of orbits, rotation of the spin-plane, and powered, precession-formed spirals. Interactions caused by collisions with resulting re-encryptions of motion codifications such as electrical transmission; atomic fission and Royal Rife's alternating DNA corrections via oscillation control could really be gyro physics. (The speaker had also intuited that DNA is a gyroscopically induced encoded-double-helix that can be re-encoded by tuned, oscillating-motion intervention.)

Our questions to all are: can gyro momentum be conserved around abrupt 90-degree corners; can gyro wheel spin 'storage' be depleted without losing RPM, and can a self-selected 800:1 torque output be maintained indefinitely with only 1/800 continuous power input (1200 in-lbf natural precession maintained by less than 2 in-lbf DC motor input)?"

[Acca]

I have studied Fran and have a large file on him..

Just to make a point about him,  as well as an English man Eric Laithwaite who invented the "Maglev" concept and who
was burned by his critics who disavow levitation as Newtonian laws are immutable...  This subject is "DEAD" to all, and  if "YOU"
say that  Newtonian laws are to be altered of even slightly pushed aside you are a Nutter case... Period....

Fran run in to THAT !! It's very sad that he died from a heart attack as he was going to the UK ...

In order to understand that rotational function of a gyro just simply negates Newton in angular directional vector and reaction counter to reaction
just simply shifts the vector, however centrifugal force is real and rotation force interacts with "EATHER SPACE"  which it's self is a also a taboo
subject in today's teachings.. Eather is negated.. again "Period dead end"..

Terminology in gyros are just words that "describe" the function and NOT the operational "movement through space" or the actual concept of how the gyro lock's it's self to eather space..  This is the enigma, "matter of fluidic space" (out of Star Trek), not so far out of the future as I think..

I have an example will link it in the future.. (it's now future every moment)...

Fran had over 200 patents which is quite shocking which made him credible as he sold his company for allot of money.. People would listen to him because of that .. He crashed his Glasair airplane after five years of working in it.. (Kit Plane) Lots of time to think why that happened.. Gyro was a problem in that accident so he went to study gyros.. When you have a mechanical construct and no ability to describe why it works and your professional engineers look at you like a inventor who has stepped out of his knowledge base and now is developing machines that attack Newton it's time to distance your self form Fran... I will leave it at that now..

I will give you some insights as to why I think that this concept is already at work since the 1950's, There are hundreds of patents in the US patent office by now since the creation of the patent office.. Plus foreign patents and some are "Incredible" so Fran could not patent the concept as people who where there earlier.. When he retired he would show to anyone the gyro concepts, pushing the demonstrations in to the public domain.. Now he was wrong in his understanding just like Eric as well a Sandy Kidd who spent some 20 years on the mechanical concept, even Scott TV did a small documentary on him.

Eric has the a BBC documentary on done on him.. "The Heretic"   link    https://www.dailymotion.com/video/x2g2ke4

Now I will steer in to the Russian space realm where this "reality" exists as Russians are not afraid of Newtonian laws..
Try this name Vladimir Leonov... his  book it's free.. 700 pages in English pdf.

This link is very important as it shows a Reaction less mass (weight) ..

[/font]https://vladimir-leonov.livejournal.com/12365.html[/font]
http://theoryofsuperunification-leonov.blogspot.com/2011/07/video-tests-2009-of-quantum-pulsed.html



[/font]
Download free. Leonov V. S. Quantum Energetics. Volume 1. Theory of Superunification, 2010.     [/font]
[/font][/font]Leonov V. S. Quantum Energetics. Volume 1. Theory of Superunification, 2010.[/font]
And the last of the NON-REACTIVE force what Fran could not explain..

You are on the right track and as usual Americans are behind the Chinese and Space shooting Russians .. look we are  HUMANS here  this small EARTH ..

"The development of the production of non-reactive quantum engines and new energy sources for their power supply based on new physics. Creation on the basis of quantum engines of interplanetary spacecraft and devices of a new generation without rocket engines. We are talking about the development of fundamentally new space technologies with a complete rejection of chemical fuel and rejection of the principle of jet propulsion. At the same time, the principle of creating a thrust force due to a jet stream when burning chemical fuel is sharply criticized as being ineffective for interstellar travel."   V.  Leonov 2020




Acca ..



   

[NdaClouDzzz]

...